Our buddies at the Dallas Business Journal send word that the city is actually still in the running for the godawful Dallas movie.
A movie scout is in Dallas for seven days to check us out. Which is appropriate, given the preliminary cast list that includes John Travolta, J Lo and Owen Wilson, because seven days is the likely length of the film's theatrical run.
The Dallas City Council will look at banning repeat parking offenders from renewing their vehicle registration, although it raises the question that vehicle registrations are a county, not city function.
Other measures to try to collect $40 million in back parking fines going back to 1986 include towing repeat offenders, posting names on the city's web site, suing those who owe more than $1,000 and disciplining city employees who don't pay.
Two students at Southern Methodist University are alleging that SMU officials have violated the school’s non-discrimination policy by barring the students from running for a student senate seat because of their race.
The two students, Brad Julsonnet and Andrew Hemming, sought to run for “special interest seats” – seats that were set aside by the Student Senate for minorities.
There are a total of four special interest seats on the Student Senate. This includes an African-American seat, an Asian seat, a Hispanic seat, and an international student seat.
Both Brad and Andrew are white and American.
“They told us we could not run because of our nationality and ethnicity,” said Brad Julsonnet, an SMU junior. Julsonnet is also the Chairman of the Young Conservatives of Texas at SMU and sought to run for the “International Student” seat. Hemming, an officer in the Young Conservatives, signed up to run for the African-American seat.
According to Hemming, the two candidates filled out an application to run for the seats on February 10th and attended the candidate’s meeting two days later. The morning after the candidate’s meeting, both Hemming and Julsonnet received an email telling them that they were ineligible to run for the seats that they signed up for.
“They would not let us run. We would have to run as write-ins, but even then we would be disqualified,” said Hemming.
About a week before the election, on February 15th, Julsonnet and Hemming went to the Office of Institutional Access and Equity to meet with Beth Wilson, the Director of Institutional Access and Equity. According to Hemming, the meeting had been set up a couple days before the 15th. Hemming said that when they showed up, they were informed that the meeting was canceled due to “illness”. They rescheduled.
That meeting was also canceled, this time due to “jury duty”.
Several weeks passed and so did the Student Senate elections. The two had delivered a written complaint and even threatened to take legal action. It was not until April 11th that Beth Wilson sent an email to Hemming saying that no violation of SMU’s non-discrimination policy was found by her office.
Julsonnet and Hemming disagree with Wilson. They have cited Section 2.1 of the University Policy Manual: “The University will not discriminate in any employment practice, education program or educational activity on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, or veteran status.”
Hemming points to several sections of the Student Code of Conduct, including Section 2.06, which states that all applicable state, local, and federal laws must be obeyed at all times. He also cites section 4.02(a)(1)(i), which states that all organizations must comply with the nondiscrimination clause.
“The racial set-asides are not supported by university policy,” said Julsonnnet. “(Student Senate) is controlling student tuition dollars and they are violating university policy in the process.”
Now, the students are considering several different avenues to pursue. According to Julsonnet, they plan on seeking to abolish the special interest seats by garnering signatures on a petition. If they get five percent of the student body to sign the petition, they can bring a resolution up for a vote before the student body next spring. That resolution would be meant to abolish the special interest seats.
Julsonnet said that he is opposed to the special interest seats not only because of the reverse discrimination that is imposed by the qualifications for running, but also because the seats insult minorities by implying that they can’t win an election without a special seat set aside for them.
“It’s the assumption that’s made that some ethnic groups cannot win without a guaranteed seat. I believe it’s basically implying that the people of these races cannot mount a successful campaign and win an election,” said Julsonnet.
Julsonnet also said that the international seat remains unfilled, even after the election.
“We’re doing it because we were being barred from running for a specific position because of our ethnic makeup,” said Julsonnet.
Gabe Travers, the former Student Senate Membership Chair, helped oversee the candidate’s meeting that Julsonnet and Hemming attended in February. According to Travers, eligibility for running was determined by the registrar. “You have to be eligible for the seat that you are applying for,” said Travers.
An official with the Dean of Students office said that the students were ineligible, but she did not say if their being ineligible constituted a form of discrimination. She said that the Dean of Student’s office “tries to give Student Senate the authority to establish their own policies and procedures.”
Travers added that Julsonnet and Hemming could have changed their race with the registrar in advance of the candidacy application deadline and been eligible to run for the special interest seats.
Julsonnet said that he was never told by anyone that he could change his race with the registrar.
According to Hemming, the next step for the two is to file a request for resolution with the University Judicial Council. Three people will then be selected to decide on the discrimination complaint. One will be selected by the Dean of Students, another by the Office of Institutional Access and Equity, and a third by Julsonnet and Hemming.
Julsonnet said that the two are considering legal avenues as well.
"Do you believe that increased trade between the United States and other countries helps or hurts American workers?" According to USA Today/Gallup 65% say its hurts while only 30% say it helps. Change "workers" to "companies" and 50% say it "hurts" versus 44% that say it "helps."
In a poll released yesterday by Rasmussen Associates 75% of all Americans said they believed that Christ rose from the dead versus only 16% who said he did not. Slightly higher percentages of African Americans and Hispanics believed in the resurrection than Anglos or Asians. The poll also found that 78% of you, regardless of religious affiliation, are now recovering from a large Easter feast.
The UTD Mercury, the student-run newspaper of The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD), received a record 32 awards for journalistic excellence in San Antonio over the weekend at the 98th annual conference of the Texas Intercollegiate Press Association (TIPA), the oldest and largest press association of its kind in the United States. The UTD Mercury captured honors in 24 of the 28 contest categories, including its first-ever Sweepstakes award as the top points-earning newspaper in its 10-school division.
One week after carrying a front page story on the so-called Gospel of Judas, the Dallas Morning News has an well-crafted editorial in its Sunday newspaper shedding light on the Judas gospel: "This gospel, like other non-canonical gospels, was written by Gnostics, adherents to an early Christian heresy that mixed pagan belief with Christian teachings. The early Church fathers frequently condemned Gnosticism , whose doctrines are bizarre and contradictory to what was emerging as normative Christianity."