| A New Contract with America |
|
|
|
| by Tara Ross | Thu, Jan 7, 2010, 01:23 PM |
|
Grab a bowl of popcorn, kick back in your favorite chair and get ready to watch your (least) favorite incumbent congressman squirm. Another election year is upon us. The campaign year promises to be entertaining, passionate—maybe even revolutionary. It feels long overdue. Republicans have an opportunity that seemed unattainable this time last year. They can reverse many of their 2008 election losses, possibly even reclaiming congressional majorities. But capitalizing on this opportunity will require them to learn from their own past failures—and the recent failures of Democrats. In 2008, a new wave of Democrats was elected as much for who they weren’t as who they were. Americans were tired of the war, worried about the economy, and cynical about Republicans who said one thing and did another. They allowed themselves to be lulled into thinking that Democrats would be more responsible with the nation’s finances, and they threw their support behind nebulous offers of “hope” and “change.” Unfortunately, elected Democrats proved to be different animals than candidate Democrats. In 2009, Americans discovered the real Democratic agenda: a big spending, high tax, anti-free market nanny state. The President’s and Congress’s approval ratings have since tanked as many Americans have grown concerned about the new direction of the country. Let’s face it. Republicans could probably win many elections seats this year based purely on the fact that they aren’t Democrats. But they must do more than merely accept these default victories. Otherwise, their gains in 2010 will be as tenuous as the Democrats’ 2008 victories proved to be. Republicans need to think about who they are, what they stand for, and what they want to accomplish for Revisiting the 1994 idea of a Contract with The writing of the contract would force Republicans to work out, in their own minds, who they are. The presentation of the contract would tell voters what they are getting if—when—Republicans win huge victories in November. Republicans will be most successful if this contract is based on the conservative, small government principles that have served Repeal Democrats’ health care reform (if passed) in its entirety. Start over. The health care reform bill pending before Congress is an unwieldy assortment of mandates, taxes, giveaways, and bribes, none of which make sense for the fiscal or physical health of the nation. There is no sense in attempting to fix the legislation. It should be repealed. The next Congress should start over, from scratch. Ensure that House and Senate votes take place on two long-sought, common-sense constitutional amendments: Term limits and a Balanced Budget. The language of this promise needs to be couched in terms of “ensuring a vote.” Vague promises of support for the idea of term limits or a balanced budget are insufficient. Many candidates pay lip service to these proposals because they know that such statements are popular with voters who want to be governed by fiscally sound principles and by senators and congressmen who remember what it is like to live outside the Beltway. Unfortunately, candidates often fail to act on their words once they are elected to office. Legislators know that the “yes” vote they have promised will go against their own self-interest. Unsurprisingly, their actions (or lack thereof) behind the scenes prevent these issues from ever coming up for a vote. A pledge promising best efforts to obtain an up-or-down vote might be the only way to force legislators to finally approve these amendments and place them where they belong: In the hands of the American people, who can choose to ratify the amendments. Ensure that House and Senate votes take place on a new Federalism Amendment. Some commentators have recently suggested that the “legislatures of two thirds of the several states, [should] call a convention for proposing amendments,” as provided by the Constitution. The idea is well-intentioned, but such a convention would undoubtedly open up a whole can of worms. Some groups would work overtime to ensure that they are overrepresented at such a convention. The convention would inevitably produce many amendments that would harm American exceptionalism more than they would help the current fiscal crisis. Imagine the proposals that are sure to be made. Repeal the Electoral College. Enshrine new “rights” (to abortion? to health care?) into the text of the Constitution. It would be much better simply to propose, in Congress, the few amendments that are really needed. Along with the amendments discussed above, a federalism amendment could provide valuable benefits. It would reinforce the rights of states to decide issues for themselves rather than dealing with unfunded, unwieldy, one-size-fits all mandates handed down by the U.S. Congress. Return unused stimulus funds to taxpayers. Government can’t spend its way out of a recession. For those who doubted this truth before, the unsuccessful stimulus efforts of 2009 should confirm it. Republicans should commit to reverse course. The accumulation of more and more debt does nothing but handicap this and future generations. Government needs to quit spending taxpayer money and reduce its demands, thus allowing hard-working Americans to help themselves and each other. Republicans need to show that they are committed to such a path. Restore all tax cuts allowed to expire under this Congress. On January 1, 2010, dozens of taxes were raised due to congressional inactivity. Another tax, the Estate Tax (a.ka. Death Tax) will also return, in its entirety, on January 1, 2011, unless Congress acts between now and then to make the tax cut permanent. This Democratic Congress is unlikely to let this immoral tax die a peaceful death. (No pun intended!) Republicans should pledge to re-repeal all taxes that have expired. Where possible, they should make their decision retroactive. Americans do not need higher tax burdens in the midst of a recession. Other ideas can be added to this list, perhaps to eliminate earmarks or to ensure that fiscally unhealthy mandates such as cap and trade never become law. But Republicans will be most successful if they keep the list as simple and straightforward as possible. They should avoid social issues, which tend to be divisive, and focus on the unifying, big picture economic items. (Enactment of a federalism amendment would cure many of the social issues anyway, because it would return these decisions to state and local entities.) Such a strategy worked with great success to focus and unify Republicans in 1994. It could work again now.
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (3)
![]()
...
written by Jim B , January 08, 2010 The Anti-Federalists would certainly appreciate the opportunity that a Constitutional Convention present them and no doubt would engage in mischief to bring it about. What would be the difference between a Federalism Amendment and the Constitutional guarantee of a "republican form of government?" Is not federalism already written into the Constitution? The Founding Fathers were rightfully suspicious of a simple majority and likely attempts by some to corrupt the political process.
...
written by michelenoyobama , January 08, 2010 add a repreal of all adiirmative action laws and return the U S to a meritocracy
...
written by rufuslevin , January 11, 2010 I would add immigration reform rules: (1)any illegal entrant to the USA that is granted immunity, may become a provisional citizen only, and cannot vote in any election for 20 years. He must learn English and it must be used in his household. His children born in the USA do not become full citizens until their 18th birthday, and must speak English and pass a USA history and civics exam in high school before becoming a citizen, as well as must complete a GED or finish the 12 grade in school. Anyone not accepting these conditions, must return to their country, and go through normal immigration and visa processes before re-entry. Anyone found in the USA unable to show they have signed up by contract for provisional citizenship and agreed to the terms upon penalty of permanent expulsion, must be tried and convicted with a large fine for illegal entry. Such fine becomes an obligation of their native country, and payable from any funds offered to that nation by the USA. (2) Any business or college offering a job or degree based upon Affirmative Action admission or hiring must designate that degree as obtained under Afirmative Action to differentiate it from the ordinary admissions process of all applicants. Ok for them to get to go, not ok for them to get the same recognition. If they do not wish such a degree, they go through regular admissions process. With business, Afirmative Action hires are subject to dismissal for cause without any review or protected protest. Otherwise, get hired on same basis, and gain ability to demand the employer show cause for any termination. The theory is if you ask for Special Consideration, it then has Special Consequences so that folks can understand that you were given a priviledge, not an entitlement based upon earning it. You get to prove yourself, but not without paying something for it. Write comment
|
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|




















