| Senate health committee considers statewide smoking ban |
|
|
|
| by Mark Lavergne | Sat, Aug 30, 2008, 10:56 AM |
|
The Senate Health and Human Services Committee met on August 26 to consider ways to “expand and optimize” the state’s investment in wellness programs. Front and center in the discussion: a statewide smoking ban in public places. The tobacco industry was under full assault in the hearing, with individual legislators and advocates calling for the expansion of smoking cessation programs in the private and public sectors, on top of calls for the ban. Opposition to the ban came from a single group that advocates limited government and free market capitalism. Dr. David Lakey of the Department of State Health Services, called tobacco the single greatest cause of preventable death in the state each year. He recommended smoke-free legislation and ordinances for public places, increased unit prices for tobacco products, a mass media education campaign, and other tobacco-suppressive measures. Lakey and several others advocated a statewide smoking ban. He cited a study saying that in 2001 no city had a smoke-free ordinance. But starting in 2002, an increasing percentage of communities — now 27 percent of the total state population — have decided on their own to become “smoke-free,” Lakey said. “We know that tobacco prevention and cessation programs that are comprehensive and sustained over time result in long-term reductions in tobacco use among Texans, when we have a comprehensive approach, enforcement, clean air laws, and being able allow individuals that want to stop smoking the tools they need,” Lakey said. But Peggy Venable, state director of the Texas chapter of Americans for Prosperity, told the committee that, while she is not a smoker or a tobacco industry advocate, she believes it may not be the government’s role to nanny its citizens. “I think we’d all agree,” Venable said, “that we’d really like people to eat their recommended daily servings of fruits and vegetables and cut back on red meat and exercise, and eliminate alcohol and tobacco and reduce stress and all these other things. But I come here saying that we don’t think it’s really the appropriate role of government to dictate our behavior.” “We think individuals, not government, should dictate the marketplace,” Venable said. “We would like to see businesses who choose to be smoke-free proliferate and prosper, but businesses should have the opportunity to have either smoking or non-smoking or a combination.” Venable’s written testimony said a statewide smoking ban would “violate property rights” and create a “significant decline in business.” But Venable’s appeal for limited government is about was as good as it got for tobacco — or for limited government — at the hearing. Kay Ghahremani, deputy director for Medicaid and CHIP policy development at the Health and Human Services Commission, said the commission was planning a tobacco cessation pilot program aimed at disabled children, who supposedly stand a greater chance of becoming addicted. The pilot will begin in October in Committee chairwoman Sen. Jane Nelson (R-Lewisville) was interested in the amount of advertising dollars tobacco companies spend each year to reach young people, and said that the state would have to expand its educational initiatives in order to be able to compete. “It is huge,” Lakey said. “The focus needs to be on keeping young people from starting to begin with,” Nelson said. “It can be very, very difficult to get the person to quit. … What you’re up against is, whatever that dollar amount is that tobacco companies are spending to try to get new customers, because their current customers are going to die.” Legislators including Sen. Judith Zaffirini (D-Laredo) and Nelson expressed interest in requiring tobacco companies to provide information about the ingredients on their products. Currently state law requires the companies to submit the ingredients to the Department of State Health Services. Nelson expressed interest in seeing the information herself. Lakey said that about $3 million flowed through the Department of State Health Services to the Texas Education Agency to provide education on tobacco. Tobacco companies spend significantly more money, about $1 billion, on advertising, Lakey acknowledges. “Workside Wellness” The committee also looked at ways of encouraging “workside wellness,” in the interest of reducing the economic costs to the state of ailments like obesity and diabetes. Raette Smith Hearne, director of administration at the Office of the Comptroller, spoke to the committee about the Comptroller’s employee wellness program, which was launched in March of last year, and “enjoys tremendous support from Comptroller [Susan] Combs.” The program provides information to its employees about oriental medicine, acupuncture, breast cancer, nutrition, stress and hormones. It also has a “stress relief room,” which provides chair massage therapy for a dollar a minute. The program offers yoga and Tai Chi. Employees are allowed to exercise during work hours up to three times a week. Hearne said she hopes to get 20 percent of the Comptroller’s workforce to participate in the program. Sen. Robert Deuell (R-Greenville) asked whether the program is translating into fewer work days missed. Hearne said the Comptroller’s office was in the process of compiling those figures. The office started with a budget of $5,000 for the program, but has kept it going through incentives for employees to participate, and through employee donations, Hearne said. Deuell said despite his confidence in the program’s effectiveness, he believed that “We need to see the benefit to those of us who are stewards of the taxpayers.” Nelson floated the idea of giving tax credits or insurance deductions to businesses that provide similar programs to their workers. The committee also looked at different ways to encourage employees to participate in wellness programs offered by businesses.
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (6)
![]()
...
written by Clyde Hicks , August 30, 2008 I am not a fan of the tobacco industry, but candidly, this "statewide ban" in the name of forcing citizens to be "healthy" seems far too intrusive on the rights and liberties of individuals; and in fact, one must wonder if the Republicans rushing to enact such a measure have totally forgotten about limited government [though they "trumpet" the term mindlessly all the time.....]. This knnd of measure smacks of totalitarianism, and is the sort of thing one might expect from a communist regime. Shame on the "Senate health committee" ..........
...
written by Bob Johnson , August 30, 2008 Here the instructions on how to pass smoking bans. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/CIA_Fundamentals.pdf
...
written by KevinM , August 31, 2008 I am really curious to know how the highbrows in think tanks world wide explain, how a Doctor today is different from a racist with a different list of target groups? WE know as a "sin tax", cigarette taxes are penance or punishment for the immoral. And as Dalton McGuinty the Premier of Ontario Canada declared; "smokers need to quit or they will be punished" leading up to the Ontario smoking ban. The punishment of smoking bans similarly, is known to be a punishment for immoral acts; this is also something we can all understand for what it is. How you explain the whines from those who are benefiting in the majority today from the healthcare system remains puzzling. A system built and maintained for the largest part of the past 60 years primarily by smokers and former smokers, who now dare seek benefit, from what they paid for, over their whole lives? Are doctors today selling the virtues of David Dukes, as a misunderstood soul, who was simply ahead of his time? I would really like to know, due to the similarity in methods of growing support through fear, exaggerated misinformation and promoted hatred; Is the Klan currently a stakeholder organization, involved in the public health or tobacco control movements or in the evolving offshoot, fat people pandemic campaign? If not, as they would see similar benefits to those which attracted the other lobby group stakeholders, are they eligible to sign up? What legitimate reason could you possibly give to refuse them? Disease management is not all that difficult to understand, nor are those who promoted it
...
written by Austin , August 31, 2008 “The focus needs to be on keeping young people from starting to begin with,” Nelson said. Who could argue with that? Write comment
|
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



























