No account yet?
Subscription Options
Subscribe via RSS, or
 
Free Email Alert

Sign up to receive a daily e-mail alert with links to Dallas Blog posts.

New Site Search
Login


Aea at TechTitans Legands
The Texas Legend is an award bestowed on an individual, company or organization in Texas whose vision, leadership and influence have had an enduring effect on the technology industry.
W. Dal Berry W. Dal Berry
Matthew Blanton Matthew Blanton
Pike Powers Pike Powers
James Truchard James Truchard
Bill DeOre
Click for Larger Image
   
Dallas Sports Blog
Local Team Sports News
NBA.com: Mavericks News
Texas Rangers News
DallasCowboys.com
FC Dallas News
Stars Recent Headlines:
Good News Dallas
Lifestyles
Oil: The Long Goodbye PDF Print E-mail
by Wes Riddle    Mon, May 19, 2008, 01:24 PM

Peak Oil is a self-evident truth, if you aren’t a stickler about just when it should happen.  Most experts agree that petroleum and fossil fuels are exhaustible resources.  They are nonrenewable unless you’ve got millions of years to spare.  Peak Oil is the point in time when the maximum rate of global petroleum production is reached, after which, the rate of production enters its natural decline.  In laymen’s terms, we start to run out of (cheap) oil.  If consumption isn’t reduced and/or alternatives discovered and developed in time before the peak—whenever that happens, it is simple economics that prices rise, and an energy crisis will ensue. 

As you might imagine, lots of variables intervene.  The moment you predict Peak Oil, you’ve got a laundry list of caveats to make.  But let’s consider a few that might affect things.  Take consumption rates.  Do you think those are coming down?  Nope.  Has the world’s population stopped growing?  Nope, it more than doubled in the last fifty years.  World crude oil demand has increased far above predictions a few years ago, driven by an insatiable need from China and India.  China’s oil consumption has grown 8 per cent per annum since 2002, and its economy is still experiencing oil shortage.  As huge energy consumers impact the market, they will compete for a dwindling, nonrenewable supply and hence drive up energy prices.  As many other economies enter a similar stage of economic development, energy needs will skyrocket and add to the pressure. 

I’m sure run-of-the-mill monetary inflation is much to blame for price increases at the gas pump, but folks you need to start getting a little more sophisticated (or at least read the big print writing on the wall!).  Don’t wait for the government to tell you, much less do anything about it.  The Bush administration isn’t exactly known for its candor with the American people (it’s all a state secret, or Executive prerogative); or for that matter competence and being proactive (Katrina, War in Iraq, etc.).  Global oil production actually already hit plateau in 2005, when Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens predicted that we probably reached the proverbial Peak Oil point. 

Even if you don’t buy that, and many experts don’t, we’re just quibbling over the next ten years and your favorite colored deck chair on the Titanic.  At an energy conference in Houston this past month, the Peak Oil prediction was 2015.  Nine of the world’s twenty-one largest fields show decline, and some fields are beginning to accelerate downward.  Even more skeptical observers will concede that discoveries peaked around 1961 and have long since failed to replace the full amount of oil produced.  Oil is being depleted in other words, we just can’t say how fast; the train is careening, but it may not go off the tracks for a couple more presidential election cycles.   

It is important to consider what we’re talking about: Peak Oil for Le Monde, the World.  We already passed it for the United States back in 1970, for North Sea oil production in 1985.  In fact, Peak Oil production has been reached in almost every oil-producing country in the world, except three notables: Iraq (may not reach it until 2018); Kuwait (predicted peak in 2013); and Saudi Arabia (predicted peak 2014).  Of course, I didn’t mention another big oil producer—Iran, because we don’t really know, and probably won’t get to the supply short of military invasion (which could happen).  Moreover, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia and other OPEC countries have every reason to overstate their proven reserves and probably have.  If you look at the frantic pace at which Saudi Arabia and the entire Gulf is diversifying economies, one wonders if the United States and other developed countries shouldn’t be reducing dependency on Middle East oil at least that fast.     

Hurricane Katrina initially wiped out 15% of U.S. refining capacity, which was strained and still is.  This resulted in a price spike of 100% as the price of gasoline went from $1.50/gallon to $3.00/gallon in just a few days.  When the Iranian revolution occurred in 1979 and crude oil prices doubled, world oil consumption dropped 15% and a worldwide recession lasted until 1982.  There isn’t much resiliency in the energy supply chain, and domestic storage capacity is less than two months.  And we’re really talking about a much bigger problem. 

Civilization probably won’t end short of a big meteor hitting the earth, but if you’re going to do anything constructive to mitigate problems our economy will face after the world hits Peak Oil, you need at least ten years to get busy.  Suggesting a bigger picture, consider that most farm equipment depends on oil and diesel, what that means to food prices and food availability.  Nearly all fertilizers and pesticides are made from oil too, as well as most plastics—used in everything from computers, mobile phones, to pipelines, clothing and carpets.  Metal production, such as aluminum, depends on oil; and even things like cosmetics, hair dye, ink, and common painkillers.  The construction of a single car takes at least 20 barrels of oil. 

It behooves us therefore to have an energy policy, unless your policy is simply to endure economic upheavals.  You might want to foster conservation, R&D, transition to alternatives—particularly other liquid fuels (alcohol, esters, vegetable oils, etc.; and liquefied petroleum products from natural gas and coal).  You might want to invest in infrastructure too, say, in storage, pipelines, rigs and rail transportation.  You should at least want to talk about it.  Now I’m not really one to run around like Chicken Little, yelling “The sky is falling, the sky is falling,” but oil production really is.  Our country faces an immense and unprecedented risk management problem, yet no presidential candidate seriously addresses it.  To the Republican candidate, it is probably a state secret like everything else.  To Democrats, it just makes their heads hurt.  Which leaves our national policy, deliberate or otherwise, essentially to suck it up: the easy oil first, and the economic consequences that follow for failure to prepare for anything else.  

Comments (6)add comment
...
written by ElHombre , May 19, 2008

And before anyone gets the idea: Drilling in ANWR is NOT. Going. To. Help. At. All.

Incidentally, the North Central Texas Council of Governments has a transportation plan consisting of a net of bike and pedestrian paths throughout the DFW area.



...
written by Paul Barnes , May 20, 2008

Excellent post, Wes. And we can expect $200/barrel oil or much higher after Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney attack Iran. Couple that with the subprime mortgage meltdown that is devasting entire neighborhoods and we will see "granite top ghost towns." Two SUVs commuting from Allen, Melissa or McKinney sure don't make sense. Our entire infrastructure is based on cheap oil and that is a thing of the past.


...
written by GS , May 20, 2008

According to Barron’s Magazine, there are an estimated 86 billion barrels of oil and 420 trillion cubic feet of natural gas under the Outer Continental Shelf that is technically recoverable. But the left won't let us recover it. They fought the Alaskan Pipeline ferociously, asserting that it would destroy the caribou population. Fortunately, they lost, we now get Alaskan oil, and the caribou herds have increased significantly. The weak dollar is one of the reasons gas is so high. If we had drilled in ANWAR, we would have 1 million barrels a day more oil. That's $50 billion a year we wouldn't be sending to Saudis or Iran. When you have to pay $3.75 a gallon, thank ElHombre and his buddies.


...
written by Ken Dickson , May 20, 2008

With the Tax that Speaker placed on offshore oil the 1st thing after taking office, refusal to drill ANWr, refusal to drill off Florida (like the Cubans & Chinese), refusal of California to allow the Santa Barbara coast to produce, what do you expect...we have a lot of domestic production that will help, but as usual the same old opponants are fighting to put us on bikes & destroy our economy!!..Yes, a declining resource, but one that would last a little longer if the idiots have to walk first!! Maybe then we could develop an alternative!!


...
written by Grrr , May 21, 2008

Excellent post Wes! I am not much of an environmentalist, but I don't see how helpful the oil that would be realized from ANWR would be helpful. We would see a drop of it in 10 years or so. In 10 years we could realistically transition to electric or fuel cell type automobiles. We will need petrochemicals for a long time--things like jets wont run on anything else--just to name jets. But if projects like ANWAR figure into a transition in our energy habits--drill!

That would require long term thinking & we just can't tolerate that.



...
written by Branden Helms , May 28, 2008

First, GS, we consume as a country 160 million barrels a day. 1 is going to have the slightest effect at best.

Second, the real problem in this country is how we shape our cities. Ourside of a few small areas, car ownership is a must. However, in pedestrian friendly, mixed-use areas, car use is an option. Believe it or not, some people do like walking and biking over their car and they will use it when needed. Next, you link neighborhoods with quality transit and gas consumption plummets. This is done in New York, an extreme example but over 50% of the 8 million people do not own a car. In Mahattan, despite a high per capita income, only 25% of the population owns a car. New York consumes gas at the rate the US did in the '20's.

That's how you reduce consumption.




Write comment
smaller | bigger
password
 

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

© 2008 Dallasblog.com, the Dallas, Texas news blog and Dallas, Texas information source for the DFW Metroplex. - DALLAS BLOG
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.