No account yet?
Subscription Options
Subscribe via RSS, or
 
Free Email Alert

Sign up to receive a daily e-mail alert with links to Dallas Blog posts.

New Site Search
Login

Bill DeOre
Click for Larger Image
   
Dallas Sports Blog
Local Team Sports News
Good News Dallas
My Most Embarrassing Moment PDF Print E-mail
by James Reza    Mon, Mar 31, 2008, 11:23 AM

In 1980 I ventured into one of the most difficult situations I’d ever engaged in my entire life.  I decided to go before the Fort Worth Independent School Board meeting to denounce their proposal to allow children of illegal immigrants to attend our public schools.

As soon as the news media got wind of my proposed presentation to the school board to ban children of illegals into our schools, I started getting phone calls from news outlets from throughout the Metroplex.  I vividly remember one reporter from the old Dallas Times Herald calling me at work and asking me why I didn’t want undocumented kids in our schools. When I explained to the reporter what non-bilingual teachers (not fluent in Spanish) were experiencing in their classrooms, she totally distorted our phone interview. The following day, one of my bosses who subscribed to the Dallas Times Herald came to me and said, “James, you are in a hell of a mess aren’t you?” as he handed me the newspaper.  There in large type was this headline, “Mexican American Opposes Undocumented Children to Attend School!”  Folks, I was mildly shocked.

In reality, what pushed me to get involved in that school fiasco was due in part to the fact that Hispanic teachers didn’t have a voice in what was happening in their classrooms.  Here I’d like to set the record straight and attempt to illustrate the Hispanic teachers’ quandary.  Children of illegal aliens were allowed to attend our school in those years, however Hispanic teachers were given the difficult task of teaching them regardless of whether they spoke Spanish or not.  Hispanic teachers who didn’t speak Spanish, actually served as babysitters instead of teachers.  Some didn’t have the language skills or the teaching tools to work with the undocumented kids.  I remember one Hispanic math teacher telling me, “James, I went to college to be a math teacher, not to be a bilingual teacher!”  Another Hispanic teacher who was fluent in Spanish, told me, “James, I’m usually assigned four or five monolingual students and feeling sorry for them I dedicate half of my class time with them instead of working with the whole class.  Last year, after working half a semester with three monolingual kids from Mexico, their parents took them back to their homeland.  I was totally disgusted with myself because I didn’t dedicate my teaching time to the entire class.  In other words folks, American kids were being denied the full attention of these Hispanic teachers.  These two incidents, plus others too numerous to mention, propelled me to oppose the school district’s decision to allow undocumented children in our schools.

Another reason I decided to speak before the School Board was that Hispanic groups like: American GI Forum, LULAC, and Mexican American Legal Defense Fund wanted to expand bilingual education to the 12th grade with the exception of music and PE.  Plus, these groups didn’t want to recognize a bilingual teaching tool that worked superbly in a three-year school experiment in El Paso, Texas ‹ Immersion.  The teaching method the nuns used and worked very well on me and my school chums at my predominately Hispanic San Jose Catholic School back in the 1940-50s.

After writing my presentation I was informed that I could only speak for five minutes.  After I timed it, my presentation took ten minutes. Given that tight spot, I asked my Uncle Pete if he would make the first five minutes of my presentation while I would follow him with the remaining content.  Hesitantly and somewhat scared, he agreed to join me in my precarious endeavor.

When the day of the school board meeting finally arrived, I felt like the biblical prophet, Daniel in the den of lions.  I could feel intense anger and hatred towards me as I walked into the School Board assembly room. Surprisingly, the assembly room was full to capacity as TV cameras blared. Sitting behind one of the two speaker’s podiums, attendees behind me quickly moved to another part of the assembly room.  Evidently, they did want to show any support for me.  After those sitting behind me moved, six brawny white men remained.  Soon, one of the men came and told me, “Mr. Reza, were are KKK members and are here to protect you in case someone wants to harm you.”  I assured him that I would be OK and thanked him.

As those opposing me began addressing the school board, I noticed that not one speaker showed any concern for the educational welfare of American students.  Most voiced their support to admit the children of illegal aliens in our public schools even at the educational expense of American kids. After my Uncle Pete made the first part of my presentation I took to the podium.  There was an eerie silence as I began to illustrate to the members of the School Board the educational concerns Hispanic teachers had relayed to me. It was then that I made this salient statement, “Ladies and gentlemen of the School Board, don’t be led to believe that an American Hispanic child’s educational needs mirrors that of a child from Mexico.  Their educational teaching methods and needs are totally different.  I beg not to jeopardize the education of American kids.  If you must educate the children of illegal aliens so be it, but don’t hurt our own while doing it.” To my surprise the School Board voted in my favor and stopped admitting children of illegals in Fort Worth schools for one year.  However, Judge William Wayne Justice a year later struck down the ruling and the rest is history.

By now, many of you might be asking, “James, were you most embarrassed when a KKK member went to show his support for you?”  No ladies and gentlemen, that was not my most embarrassing moment.  My most embarrassing moment was when not one American Hispanic, Black, or White parent showed up to support me as I went to fight for their kid’s education!

Comments (12)add comment
...
written by Robert Sykes , March 31, 2008

Well James, you did your best.
Did anybody support you under table?



...
written by ATTICUS , April 01, 2008

Typical Reza "I've got mine now to Hell with you" rhetoric.


...
written by manny , April 01, 2008

atticus I agree
that is typical of us as Hispanics....I will even dare to say that some of us would join the Klan if we could. I think it is a reflection of our putting down of our culture and us wanting to be something else.
It goes back to England being better than Spain I think? or at least in our perception



...
written by equalitynotrevenge , April 01, 2008

As usual, the hatred and anger towards one who works hard and/or has commonsense shows.

Reza has to endure not only hardships put upon him by those that might oppose him for just being himself, but then has to endure the hardships put upon him by the jealous racists who happen to be of his own race.

And look who also gets power due to racism: The KKK.

While those KKKlowns should automatically be dismissed as the racists THEY ARE, they are given power by those who would support "justified racism"

If you want to be treated equally and fairly WITH RESPECT then you cant seek revenge.

Equality not revenge



...
written by rene martinez , April 01, 2008

Was my comment accepted?


...
written by Rene Martinez , April 02, 2008

Mr. Reza, once again you make false generaliztions based on a few isolated examples. Read the ruling of Phyler vs. the State of Texas. This was the Supreme Court ruling that, in 1986 allowed children of undocumented workers to be able to attend public schools. This ruling was supported by our local Catholic Diocese, Jewish organizations and many protestants churches in Dallas.This ruling also was the bases for defeating the Hazelton and Farmers Branch immigration cases. We even set-up private schools for over 1000 children during this period of litigation.

Secondly, your observation on student academic achievment between Limited English Proficient students and non-LEP Hispanic students is very inacurrate. Bilingual education programs in the 70's and 80' were primarily transitional programs...targeting PreK-3 grade levels. Very few school districts had any bilingual initiatives above the 5th grade. Your observations are not correct and very misleading.

Within the past few years, Dual Language Bilingual Instruction is becoming the most successful initiative in many cities throughout the country. FWISD, DallasISD, and many other scchool districts are now implementing this intiative.

To see success, check out the Ysleta ISD and look at their student performance. Last I saw, El Paso has a large number of LEP students and also non-LEP's...and by the way, your new neighbor in Arlington ISD is Hector Montenegro, the former superintendent of Ysleta....talk to him about their success story.



...
written by equaltiynotrevenge , April 03, 2008

Phyler vs. Texas

The Supreme Court of the US of A once ruled THAT SLAVERY WAS LEGIT!

So an incorrect law must be fought, not just accpeted because on likes the error to "their side"

Thats the difference between REZA and the rest of you.

He doesnt play politics ( at least what I have read so far.. dont know the man) he just ajudicates based on freedom FOR ALL PEOPLE NOT JUST THOSE THAT LOOK OR SPEAK LIKE HIM

NOw in that above statement I give him MY attributes, but thats the way I see it cause thats the way he says it.



...
written by Rene Martinez , April 03, 2008

With all due respect, it was not the Supreme Court! Slavery was allowed by states and as I remember correctly we fought a Civil War to ablolish it and emancipate the slaves and vestiges of slavery. The Bill of Rights and later amendments to the constitution through the legislative process and litigation made the Supreme Court create new rulings and establish law during the 20th Century that brought about civil and human rights for all Americans.


...
written by Dan Comstock , April 03, 2008

Mr. Reza has a great deal of wisdom and I appreciate his genuine caring (which seems obvious to me but seems to escape some observers) about his fellow man and his love for America. Regarding education, we really need to do something about the dropout rate. Regarding teaching English to those for whom Spanish is their first language, I think immersion is the best approach. This is partially because it more quickly gets the students on the same level. From a good citizenship point of view, English has served us well as our unifying language and I would think the earlier one learned it the better for both the advancement of the individual and for the well being of our country. One can continue to enjoy the beauty of the Spanish language and I know that I myself would only be richer for it if I took the time to learn it. However, since we are talking about educating children in America I believe we need to give them every opportunity to excel from the very start so they can fully participate and also contribute to our national unity and well being.


...
written by equaltiynotrevenge , April 04, 2008

R Martinez,

The point was "even" the Supreme court, the highest of high's, the almightyist of almighty's dont always get it correct :)

no offense taken



...
written by Dan Comstock , April 05, 2008

This is just a point of order in context of rule of law and going back to first principles. The Supreme Court has a Constitutional Duty to interpret the law according its meaning. It does not have the right to expand upon the meaning. The Congress (House and Senate) has the Constitutional Duty to create laws that are within the limits set up by the Constitution. That gives the legislature much but not unlimited latitude. That is why occasionally we need amendments to the Constitution (e.g., the 13th and 15th addressing slavery). The Supreme Court does not get it wrong because it rules in favor of a bad law. It gets it wrong when it tries to improve an old law or create a new law. That is the duty of the Legislative Branch. It is also the duty of the people to support good legislation (e.g., most of the essential provisions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act). The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was needed in order to enforce provisions of the 13th and 15th (possibly others) Amendments to the Constitution and the right of the Legislative Branch to do this was declared in those amendments. However, giving the Judiciary the power to change the law will lead to the rule of men and will actually sabotage the rule of law. This leads to tyranny. Most tyrants start out by seeming to be the good guys. Even well meaning judges who do not exercise judicial restraint are dangerous to our future well being.


...
written by John T.Patterson , April 08, 2008

No truer words werre spoken James!!FYI:I'm a 10th Generation Scots-Irish American
but I've always had very many good friends who are Mexican American
and have always felt more welcomed in their homes than others!!




Write comment
smaller | bigger
password
 

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

© 2008 Dallasblog.com, the Dallas, Texas news blog and Dallas, Texas information source for the DFW Metroplex. - DALLAS BLOG
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.