| Obama's Race Speech Needed to Be Said |
|
|
|
| by Carolyn Barta | Wed, Mar 19, 2008, 06:20 PM |
|
“We the people…in order to form a more perfect union.” Barack Obama started his speech on race Tuesday with these simple words that began the preamble to the Constitution of the United States. And yet, 221 years since these words were written, not far from where he delivered his speech in Philadelphia, this union is still far from perfect. One area of American life that white and black alike still struggle with is the issue of racism. And so Obama chose not to ignore, not to sweep it under the rug like more unwanted dust, but to address it head-on in what may be the signature speech of his presidential campaign – even more so than all those “Yes, We Can” orations. “The fact is,” Obama stated, “that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through – a part of our union that we have to perfect.” Obama went on to condemn the remarks but not the man who made them, and to suggest that the way the media treats presidential campaigns – and the issue of race – is not helping the nation move toward that more perfect union. The speech was delivered in response to recently publicized “incendiary” remarks made of Obama’s Chicago pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. “Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely,” he noted, “just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests or rabbis with which you strongly disagree.” Rev. Wright’s comments, he said, were wrong and divisive -- “divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems – two wars, a terrorist threat, a failing economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.” In refusing to repudiate the man who made the divisive comments, he tried to explain how they came out of the black experience, out of another generation, indeed out of the black church – the place where black people find comfort on Sunday morning at an hour that remains the most segregated of the week in America. Obama acknowledged that the church contains kindness and cruelty, fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, struggles and successes, love, and yes, “the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.” Still, Mr. Wright is like family to him and Obama said he can “no more disown him than I can disown the black community,” he said. The importance of Obama’s speech, it seems to me, is not whether he repudiated the pastor (as Republicans have demanded that he do) but that he used the speech to underline a fundamental theme of his campaign: change -- including the courage to face up to the fact of racism and admit that attitudes need to change – and say it in a way that doesn’t drive more wedges. Toward that end, the white community needs to acknowledge that “what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people.” The change he talked about also has to do with campaigning and with how the media covers campaigns and other news. Republicans no doubt will continue to bring up the Wright issue, if Obama is the candidate, as a way of reinforcing racial prejudices. And the media will continue to analyze and re-analyze the racialness of it all. Obama justly talked about the choice facing the country: tackling race only as a spectacle, as in the O.J. trial -- or in the wake of tragedy, as in the aftermath of Katrina – or as fodder for the nightly news. “We can play Rev. Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. “We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies. “We can do that. But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.” Obama likely didn’t attract any new voters, but this was a speech he had to make. It was carefully penned, honest, and necessary -- even if it swayed not a single vote. The truth is that Obama may have been irreparably damaged by this issue, suggesting that he may not be electable in November. Republicans obviously see a way now to get at him. Even so, this was an important speech, and one that needed to be made. Whether or not Obama is your candidate…whether or not you think he has enough or the right kind of experience. And whether or not he becomes president…this year…one fact remains. He’s right about the need for this country to understand, step up to heal the racial divide and move on from the racial issues of the past. It may take a president like him to close the great racial divide. He’s also right about the divisive way that the media covers the presidential campaign. The media is doing little to help the nation repair. Maybe the founding fathers should have written: ”We the peoples…” because we are far from being one. But here, don’t take my word for it. Read The Speech for yourself.
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (23)
![]()
...
written by Sam Coats , March 20, 2008 Carolyn I read many of the blogs, but have never responded to an article before. Thanks for an insightful and honest look at what Barock Obama is facing and is trying to articulate. We have a rare opportunity as a nation to show that we truly are truly the wonderfully diverse and inclusive society our forefathers envisioned in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. This guy has the judgment, maturity, and honesty to be a great president. He also has the skills to bring folks together, not divide us as has been the case for so many years. I believe we can demonstrate to the world that the best years of the United State of America are in the future,and that we are a nation of strength because of our diversity, not in spite of it. I hope everyone who reads your blog will read his speach in its entirety. It has a beautiful message for all Americans. Sam Coats
...
written by Ken Dickson , March 20, 2008 Carolyn, you still reflect the same old media defense of the liberal who has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar! Obama is a racist no different than the so-called Pastor Wright, pushing an agenda to cause white-America to sympathize with long-ago ills that have been put to bed years ago! No, he gained no Republican votes, but he didn't reflect any brilliance either with his defense of his racist preacher!
...
written by David W. Gilbreath , March 20, 2008 The white community needs to acknowledge that “what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people.” Carolyn, I will be happy to make that acknowledgement as soon as the African-American community is willing to acknowledge that what ails the African-American community is not totally the fault of white people and when the African-American community is willing to stop crying racism everytime they do not get their way.
...
written by RelicMM , March 20, 2008 Obama speaks with a serpent's tongue and the cunning of Satan to mesmerize his followers and apparently even the liberal media. You and he should have been in the race riots in Tulsa in the Thirties when many white people including my Catholic in-laws risked safety to shield and protect their colored servants they respected as part of the family against the KKK that ran roughshod over Jews, Blacks, and Catholics in that era. Those blacks that have risen above perpetual victimhood and lead heppy lives deserve better representation than a raving lunatic and his bigotry and maliscious lies. If Obama is elected, will the change he preaches take us back to those dark years of our history and replace the white minority bigotry and hate with black minority bigotry and hate? Caveat emptor. If blacks want to unite this nation, they should emulate Supreme Court Justice Thomas and Thomas Sowell and avoid Obama like the plague.
...
written by Darrell Jordan , March 20, 2008 Carolyn: My compliments on a thoughtful and instructive review of Mr. Obama's excellent speech. My friend, Sam Coats, went further than I would go in his praise of its author, but I agree the speech needs to be read in its entirety in order to be understood as not just a defense of Mr. Obama's relationship with his pastor, but as a profound statement of American values and principles. Thanks.
...
written by Paul Perry , March 20, 2008 I have both read and heard the Senator's flag-wrapped speech. I am aghast at your presumption of this man's honesty. This man knew his "pastor" from a twenty-year association. This "pastor," until recently, was Obama's spiritual advisor, "G. D. America" indeed. Wright is not only blasphemous but a nutcase! "Spiritual Advisor" -- those were Obama's words. Subterfuge--I think so! One speech is not sufficient to expunge his association with Wright's hate and rage, especially when he is in denial of how misplaced it is. He must have known about Wright's hate and offensiveness, and he should have distanced himself from Wright a long time ago if he really wants to be a positive change for this country. If he does not understand that men like Wright and David Duke are dangerous, then he does not deserve to be a county commissioner in this country, much less a President. We do not need a rage-filled President. We also do not need a President who would presume to lecture at a time he should have offered nothing but contrition. Suave he may be, but sociopathic he may well prove. If a white politician had a twenty-year association with a "Christian Identity" (racist) pastor, you would not be so naive. At least I hope it is only naivete. I hear the deception of Robert Mugabe in this man, another man who promised reconciliation.
...
written by Roger Herrera , March 20, 2008 As far as being on the 2008 Democratic ticket, Sen Obama is done. Right or wrong, he can't come back from Reverend Gate. Once Sen Clinton becomes the Democratic nominee, the Party will come together.
...
written by HSH , March 20, 2008 I'm always amazed at the comments I read on this blog. Yes, Carolyn was right. The message in Sen. Obama's speech needed to be delivered, but Dallas has many within its community who are deaf. I will add only the following taken from an article in today's New York Times: "Religious groups and academic bodies, already receptive to Mr. Obama’s plea for such a dialogue, seemed especially enthusiastic. Universities were moving to incorporate the issues Mr. Obama raised into classroom discussions and course work, and churches were trying to find ways to do the same in sermons and Bible studies. The Rev. Joel Hunter, senior pastor of a mostly white evangelical church of about 12,000 in Central Florida, described Mr. Obama’s speech, in which the Democratic presidential candidate discussed his relationship with the former pastor of his home church in Chicago, as a kind of “Rorschach inkblot test” for the nation. “It calls out of you what is already in you,” Dr. Hunter said, predicting that those desiring to address the topic would regard the speech as a spur, while those indifferent to issues of race might pay it little heed. Dr. Hunter said the Obama speech led to a series of conversations Wednesday morning with his staff members. “We want for there to be healing and reconciliation, but unless it’s raised in a very public manner, it’s tough for us in our regular conversation to raise it,” he said. The Obama speech was also a topic of discussion on Wednesday at the Washington office of the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic advocacy and social welfare group. Hispanics can be white, black or of mixed race. “The cynics are going to say this was an effort only to deal with the Reverend Wright issue and move on,” said Janet Murguia, president of La Raza, referring to the political fallout over remarks by Mr. Obama’s former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., which prompted Mr. Obama to deliver the speech. But Ms. Murguia said she hoped that Mr. Obama’s speech would help “create a safe space to talk about this, where people aren’t threatened or pigeonholed” and “can talk more openly and honestly about the tensions, both overt and as an undercurrent, that exist around race and racial politics.”
...
written by equalitynotrevenge , March 20, 2008 Black people readily admit that they like the fear that whites have That is no better than the KKK. Some people think that if Obama is not elected it means we are a racist nation. But the same people, if Obama is elected are still going to say this is a racist country. NO other place can people of different races have risen to the top . Blacks racism is bringing Obama down. Think of how amny white independents were voting for him but after the Rev Wright and the connection to the Black liberation ( thanks to Ken Blackwell for the expousure of this)you can bet he will lose many votes. Obama is probably a decent person, when you put politics aside. But the association with the Black version of the KKK nullifies it all
...
written by Nobody's Fool , March 20, 2008 The words are pretty and , but Obama's actions (which amount to doing not much of anything) speaks louder than his words to the many who were acutely listening. How can we trust these word or the man delivering them when Obama has NEVER stood up to Wright or challenged his views for change within the Black church and/or within or outside the black community in all of 20 years? Furthermore, when has Obama ever taken a public stand to end such racism before the pretty speech. Such words in the context delivered are disingenuous at best.
...
written by Joe Sullivan , March 21, 2008 Carolyn: It was a good speech, no doubt about it. I saw it, and then studied the text. After thought, it seems to me to do the following: 1) Raise the issue of race into the public forum, just as you say; 2) Continue to downplay the really poisonous aspects of Wright's thinking and teaching, and obama's connection with them; 3) More importantly, offer a socialist solution to the problem, by having the state take away the causes of everybody's fears and grievances. We all need to get past his masterful rhetoric, and the race issue and, focus on the last point, because that is where he shows the kind of president he would be. We need to understand what he really plans to do, and what the likely consequences will be. Good or bad, that is where the rubber meets the road. We must get past the emotion, and get into the substance. As a previous Democrat candidate used to say, "Where's the beef?"
...
written by HSH , March 21, 2008 Equality not revenge (whatever that means): I read the Fox News transcript of the Hannity interview with Ken Blackwell, et al, that you reference. In typical Hannity fashion, he takes five-word snippets and uses them out of context to create and support his hysterical view of the moment. It's worthless blather. Rather than worthless blather, we should all be working to discuss race in America in a constructive manner. I'm telling this story because I think it's an example of just that: Just prior to the TX primary my mother (72), was in a rural Texas hospital for surgery. I stayed with her the entire time. Many members of her Baptist Sunday School class visited, many of whom I know personally. Her closest friend from SS class would come sit with her at lunch to relieve me. My mother had already warned me that "A" had opinions that would shock me and that she would try to "start something with me". It is my practice to answer questions honestly and with the facts and show everyone respect. "A", knowing that I was an Obama supporter, started a conversation with me the last day of my mother's hospitalization which I now consider amazing, when viewed next to recent events. "A" grew up in deep East Texas, the daughter of a wealthy cotton merchant. She is also a retired school teacher. When asked why I would support a Muslim, I calmly answered that he's not a Muslim, he's a Christian like you and me. She then went on to say that civil rights has ruined the country, and that when she was growing up the blacks had their own schools, doctors, lawyers, businesses, and everyone got along just fine. I answered that yes, maybe som but their schools were in old buildings with no heat or plumbing; the books they used were hand-me-downs from the white schools and the students had to share, so no students could take books home with them, and so on. I didn't accuse her of being a racist, although I personally consider her one, nor did I argue with her. We had a long, actually constructive conversation. I doubt minds were changed, but both of us learned something from the other from that conversation. I give this example because that conversation is one of many that may now be happening, and that's a good thing. It's time for all of us to confront our own biases, and try to reach out and heal. Truth is, the extreme economic insecurity we are all facing now crosses all racial lines, as does every major obstacle we face in the coming years. The miracle of America is that together we are able to confront our problems, rise above them, and move forward. That's what we need now, not more Sean Hannity fanning flames rather than stomping them out.
...
written by Nobody's Fool , March 21, 2008 If Reverend Wright was white saying what he has been saying, and if the candidate were white who gave the same speech as Obama, the first would be deemed a racist, the second, delusional. We are living a double standard and a long way from being color blind as a nation. Obama, by NOT standing up to Wright year's ago and by supporting this church is the problem. Wright's way of thinking is hate and anger as the message, how can the white or hispanic community hope to have a constructive "healing" conversation with folks who think and communicate in that way?
...
written by jb , March 21, 2008 Carolyn; Were Wright's comments "incendiary" OR were they incendiary? just curious....
...
written by Anthony E , March 22, 2008 Barta and all: Senator Obama provided a speech that will go down in the logs of history as a major step in the right direction. At this point, if the United States does not want a president of this stature, then we don't deserve him! Also, before we criticise Reverend Dr. Jeremiah Wright, let's get the facts straight. The sermon in question is at http://digg.com/2008_us_electi..._contex t. In it he repeats the words of the United States Ambassador to Iraq. Before he is labeled as incendiary, remember that Dr. King promoted pressure on this same racial issue which existed then and has not been adequately, even moderately, addressed to this day. Listen to Wright's sermon and make an intelligent critique, unlike the rest of the journalist.
...
written by Ron Hinds , March 22, 2008 Carolyn, Carolyn, Carolyn... Of course it was a nice sounding speech - that's what Obama does, deliver pretty speeches. It is a shame he thought it was good strategy to throw his poor white grandmother under the bus. And its a shame that the next day the best thing he could say about her was that she "is a typical white woman." Gee, this is the woman who loves him and helped raise him. Juan Williams, NPR, later observed that Obama wants to be the leader of the nation and yet he sat in his pew for 20 years listening to this anti-America, anti-white venom and never squeaked and never walked out. Instead, Obama publicly described this racist preacher as his "mentor." Leadership? Obama? Yeah, right!
...
written by Gehrig Saldaña , March 23, 2008 I can't believe Senator Obama would have gone to his church for over two decades and not have known his pastor, Jeremiah Wright, was preaching sermons with a subtext of anti-white vitriol and not have taken issue with his pastor's hatemongering rhetoric years ago. Republican or Democrat, it should not matter what side of the political aisle you're from. I would have been offended if I would have been at Senator Obama's church with my family and grand-kids while Senator Obama's pastor made obscene sexual gyrations while explaining Monica Lewinsky's encounter with former US President Bill Clinton and blurting off GOD DAMN AMERICA. At best, that's the kind of stuff one would expect to hear at an adult comedy club.
...
written by rene martinez , March 27, 2008 Carolyn, I also want to compliment you on your article but I disagree that it has done harm to Senator Obama's candidacy. What many whites do not understand, unless they have visited a black church and service is the dynamics of this event and process. Having attended and been a member of Rev. Zan Holmes's church, St. Lukes Methodist, many of Zan's sermons were very similar to Rev. Wright's...filled with biblical metaphors and messages. The black chucrch has a very different history and experience that you can only appreciate if you participate and observe. Again, great article.
...
written by Roger Herrera , March 27, 2008 Rene, my spiritual mother was an African-American pastor. She would NEVER have preached anything remotely similiar to what Jeremiah Wright proclaims. No way. Pastor Angie Dickson believed too much in this country and all her family, brown, black, and white. She passed away during my mayoral campaign.
...
written by Rene Martinez , March 27, 2008 With all due respect, Roger, don't take Rev. Wright's sermons out of context plus factor in his generational background...I don't know your pastor but denominations are different...not just because they are black. White pastors and services give different social messages...go to Park Cities Baptist and then go to First Methodist and the message is different. Zan Holmes, who I admire provided a very fiery and passionate sermon and message..condemning our city leadership when it needed to be chastised.
...
written by Roger Herrera , March 28, 2008 Rene, with all due respect, publicly saying, "God, damn America" is wrong and probably treason in time of war. I think if folks don't like it here, then they should move to another country.
...
written by ATTICUS , April 01, 2008 Roger, there you go again, taking three words of Wright's sermon completely out of context. As Rene so adroitly recommends, GO READ THE ENTIRE SERMON. Then, you will see the true context in which those words were uttered. Similar words have been uttered from white pulpits. It's pure Old Testament Ezekiel. Carolyn, very insightful column. And, as could be expected, the knee-jerk reactions reflected in these comments show that Dallas maybe hasn't changed that much from the days of General Walker and his ilk spitting at Adlai Stevenson and his wife. We still have a long, long way to go. Write comment
|
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|


























