| Suits Prevail Over Citizens; Hunt Wins Battle of Integrity |
|
|
|
| by Sam Merten | Wed, Nov 7, 2007, 02:18 PM |
|
I was wrong. I underestimated Carol Reed and the influence of Mayor Tom Leppert. They did it again. Only five months after Leppert was elected, this dynamic duo convinced voters to take another huge leap of faith using money and the backing of In today’s DMN, you’ll find a great story by transportation writer Michael Lindenberger. He wrote that while the battle over whether the Trinity Parkway belongs inside the Trinity River park may be over, construction of the toll road is still years away. “Plus, there are still obstacles to the high-speed highway's ultimate approval. Two levels of federal approval are needed; transportation officials expect no difficulty obtaining either, but neither is expected until at least 2009 and maybe later. They must also decide whether the road is financially realistic.” Now that Leppert and all the Vote No’ers got their wish on this vote, time will only tell if they really will get their road in the park. So much is up in the air and Lindenberger’s story addresses this issue. I wonder why this wasn’t published before the election. Anyway, there are really no hard feelings on my behalf. The voters have spoken and I can live with that. I don’t have to like it, though. The whole “suits vs. citizens” argument couldn’t have been expressed any better than last night’s watch parties. I didn’t make an appearance at Gilley’s, but from all reports I heard, it was a lot of suit-wearing peeps. I chose to spend my evening at the MAC (big surprise). I took the wife and kids with me to experience democracy in action. The MAC had all kinds of people from different parts of the city. Contrary to what Scott Bennett thinks, not everyone was wearing Birkenstocks. Things were rough from the start as the early voting numbers weren’t encouraging, but everyone tried to keep their heads up. Around 9:40, Hunt addressed the crowd. She thanked everyone and said she started to make a list of all the people she wanted to thank individually. She said she stopped after writing five pages of names. It was a very emotional time for her as “we love you Angela,” “Angela for mayor,” and “thanks Angela” were some of the comments yelled out from the crowd. Hunt said the job for everyone supporting the referendum was to hold Mayor Leppert accountable for all the promises he made throughout the campaign. She stressed that 91,000 people signed the petition and the vote was much closer than some people would have thought. Dave Levinthal of the DMN labeled Hunt a “loser” in the election and Dallas Blog’s Rufus Shaw had this to say in his column today. “But I guess I am more disappointed in Angela Hunt and her followers who made such a point early on in this election about how dishonest the pro toll road people were. When I wrote about the dishonesty of the “Vote Yes” forces in the southern sector in a past column, Ms. Hunt and her followers never acknowledged the misdeed nor did they seem to care about it. I guess to them it was all right if they lied to black folks.” Shaw is referring to his column about a handout regarding Laura Miller’s involvement in this project. He is entitled to his opinion, but I for one did not dodge the issue. I talked about it with Tom Pauken and Scott Bennett on KVCE 1160 AM. I find it ironic that Shaw is accusing people of not acknowledging things when someone posted a comment on that column questioning his wife’s involvement as treasurer with Friends of Tom Leppert. In his recent column, Shaw also accused Dallas Blog readers of not questioning the motives of Angela Hunt and demonizing those who posted views in favor of the road in between the levees. He also said this about the ballot. “However, many of the anti-toll road votes were based on the confusing ballot which caused some voters to not know how to vote on the issue.” I’m not sure what research his ballot statement is based on, but I think it’s fair to say the confusion on the ballot likely worked against both sides. To attribute any “yes” votes to confusion without anything to back it up is unfair. Your side won, Rufus, and you were right as Tom Pauken made very clear in his column. As for this idea that readers should have questioned the motives of Hunt or perhaps she’s some kind of a loser after this, I strongly disagree. Angela Hunt didn’t do this to become mayor. She did it for Don’t believe me? Think I’m too sympathetic because I believe in her cause? You’re wrong. Anyone who really knows Angela Hunt would never accuse her of doing this for herself. Hunt is a genuine person, one who fights for what she believes in. You don’t stand up to the newly minted mayor, the rest of the city council, state senators, big business, The Dallas Morning News and everyone else if you want to further your political career. Hunt saw something wrong with the Trinity River Project. She’s not the first council member to have issues with it. However, she was the first one to devote the incredible amount of time and effort it took to give Her side didn’t win and some will say her political career is doomed as a result. I say nothing could be further from the truth. Hunt won the most important battle fought in all of this, the battle of integrity. Mayor Leppert and the Vote No! gang resorted to lies, misinformation and scare tactics to get this vote. Despite what Shaw and others might say, Hunt ran an honest campaign and did everything in her power to bring facts to the citizens of For that, Hunt should be proud and those who stood by her should be proud too. “Honesty pays, but it doesn't seem to pay enough to suit some people.” - Kin Hubbard (1868-1930) 
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (42)
...
written by Sharon Boyd , November 07, 2007 Angela only lost a battle last night. She and her team will win this war. The other side knows it. They may want to treat her like a pariah now, but now there aren't many people in town who don't know Angela Hunt's name. Bet there aren't many in Dallas who came name 2 other councilmembers. Sam, you and Jim have been heroic in your support.
...
written by David , November 07, 2007 Damn right. Angela Hunt has shown nothing but courage and conviction throughout this whole thing. Her star is only going to rise. Dallas needed to have this vote. Thanks, Angela, for being the one local leader with the strength to put the people, and the city, first. You've got more backbone than the rest of them combined.
...
written by Brian74 , November 07, 2007 Thanks for your reporting on this Sam. You've done this city a service. Because of this campaign, we now know that there's a new voice in Dallas that demands to be heard and demands to hold our elected officials accountable. That voice will not go away because the vote didn't go our way.
...
written by Tucker Willis , November 07, 2007 Sam: I have supported various political candidates and propositions over my life and been on winning and losing sides. But I have never lost a friend with whom I held a contrary position. You seem to believe that Ms. Hunt is the one who cares about Dallas and Mayor Leppert and folks like me don't, or don't as much. The bad guys v. the good guys. That seems quite condescending to me. We just saw the issue differently. The “suits v. citizens” argument is bogus. I have on my Birks just now. The implication is I don’t have equal standing as a citizen with you. As to the VoteNo “gang," the innuendo is quite clear. Almost to a person anyone responding to my comment’s on this web site supporting both the tollroad and the park labeled me as an undercover Citizens Council rep, an obvious landowner in the area affected, stupid, uninformed, on the take, anti-park, etc. I only became engaged in this matter when I saw the theme "Keep their tollroad out of our park" as if I was a sinister "they" and it wasn't my park too because I wasn't part of "our." What I wanted to do was discuss THE park, the one that can be built in the floodway. I have enjoyed rapping with you about this. Writing comments on your site caused me to think long and hard about what I believe. Hizhonor has a huge leadership task to bring this project off. I am so glad we will finally get under way. See you in the park some time.
...
written by No. Dallas Voter , November 07, 2007 Angela won in the long run! Leppert now has half the voters not only opposed to him, but after all his lies and pandering, many truly dislike him & his arrogant, nasty demeanor (shown throughout th campaign). Just because he has learned the Carol Reed/Ron Kirk language of fast talking , redundant tautologies doesn't mean he understands how to lead Dallas to a more liveable future. Many of us will be looking forward -hopefully from afar- to enjoying the next 3 1/2 years of his misery! Unfortunately, Dallas will be the poorer because of him (although we do understand that he will be much richer along with his politician "friands" who gave nothing to "his" campaign, but were paid pleanty by "his" small number of Vote No contirbuters!) Let the fun begin!!
...
written by Steven , November 07, 2007 Tucker, why haven't we been able to "get this huge project underway" before now?
...
written by sal costello , November 07, 2007 Sam, I like your style. Where else can your work be read?
...
written by Kevin , November 07, 2007 If "the suits" would have starting building the road in the ten years that have been wasted (so far) deciding what to do, they wouldn't be so far over-budget and they wouldn't have had to put up with Angela Hunt. The next question to ask the suits is where the original bond money is, and where it has been spent, since in 1997, it was enough for the entire project. I find it comical that some of the DMN columnists are calling for dirt to start flying. All the pro-toll-road team last night won was the right to argue with the Corps and the EPA and Congress and everyone else whether or not the project actually makes sense - that is, building a high-speed toll road inside a floodway. That does not seem like much of a victory.
...
written by Michael M. , November 07, 2007 I consider this election a Pyrrhic victory. Okaying the toll road to proceed does not make it less of a boondoggle. Voting on a road that has no finalized plans, no approval, nothing, so what? Now that they're allowed to proceed, we'll see about all the lies and mis-statements. I predict we will hear from Leppert a lot "It depends on the meaning of (fill in the blank)". Calculate the dollars per vote the No side paid vs. the Yes's. This was very much about money. A lot of money was spent to garner the No's. It was passion that garnered the YES's.
...
written by Courtney , November 07, 2007 Sam, thank you so much for your coverage of this issue. It is people like you who helped expose this issue and spread the truth to the citizens of Dallas. We may not have won the vote last night, but at least democracy got its chance. I look forward to continuing to read your insightful reporting on this and other issues in the future.
...
written by Nathan , November 07, 2007 I just hope Leppert doesn't say mission accomplished. Or maybe I do?
...
written by Rufus Shaw , November 07, 2007 Sam, I still don't quite understand what my wife's involvement with the Friends of Tom Leppert has to do with anything I have written. She was not invovled in any in the Vote No effort. The Friends of Tom Leppert organization that my wife is invovled with has never had a meeting nor did it have anything to do with the recent election. As for your fascination with Angela Hunt, well before you ever wrote a column in this town I was the first person to raise questions about Laura Miller. At that time she had many loyal beleivers who refused to see the dark side of Ms. Miller; kinda of like you and others who refuse to accept that there maybe a dark side to Angela Hunt. But I am patient. I will wait and watch just like I did when the Laura Miller mania swept the media off its feet. I see a lot of similarities between Laura Miller and Angela Hunt. I still don't understand how Vote No became my side. I have written several columns about this election and I have not endorsed the Vote No position in any one of them. If I was a supporter of Vote No, I would certainly have done as you have for Vote Yes and take every opportunity to promote the Vote No cause. None of my columns can be called promotional pieces for Vote No.
...
written by michael a. , November 08, 2007 Sam, thank you for informing me about the Trinity River Parkway. I was so glad to find you when information in the press was so lacking. You, like Angela Hunt, have integrity and it's a shame your few and far between. Thanks again. Michael
...
written by joseph raines , November 08, 2007 Sam, You have been a voice of reason and integrity in a world of misrepresentation and outright misleading by the likes of the Dallas Managed News and the so-called leaders in the city. And for Mr. Shaw to imply that there is a dark side to Angela Hunt is humorous. I wonder if he thinks there is a dark side to Leppart or Caraway or some of the other less-than-admirable people in power in this city. I have lived in Dallas for 20 years and have to seriously consider if I should stay. This is one screwed up, second-rate, business-driven city. World class? Hardly!
...
written by Larry , November 08, 2007 The political climate of this City is changing along with the demographics, and changing fast, thank God. It won't be long before this obscene result can never happen again, and dinosaurs like old man Decherd, his fat cat cronies at the Dallas Citizens Council, his moronic flunkies at the increasingly irrelevant and incompetent Morning Snooze, old scumbag whores like Carol Reed and the sock puppet City Council (but for Angela) will become extinct. Be patient...a bright new day will soon be upon us.
...
written by Nathan , November 08, 2007 Sam, Rufus is something of an 'arm chair philosopher.' He is Steve Blow's soul brother right her at Dallas Blog. I'm glad to read his column, usually. His observations from 'south of the Trinity' are hardly ever based on the empirical but are a nice addition to the Dallas Blog medley. Most of us like you because you, unlike Rufus and Pauken, sniff around and dig a little. We don't care how biased you are, just give us a little dirt that we won't read in the DMN and you'll stay golden.
...
written by Justin Spence , November 08, 2007 Sam, Wish I would've had the chance to shake your hand last night at the MAC. I love your research and brilliant reporting. I moved to Austin last year because it's an easy target to be around great people. But, like I told Angela and Paul, I've been contemplating moving back again because of the new light you've helped shed on this town. I really thought we had this in the bag. But, man! 47% feels really good too! At least I know there's people I can hang out with in this city. All I have to do is open a precinct map. ; ) I've got a hope again. Thank you for your hard work.
...
written by Mike , November 08, 2007 Come back, Justin. You'd like and feel at home in the White Rock Lake area, as I have. You are young and energetic and will help see that Dallas becomes all it can and should be.
...
written by Sandro Mungioli , November 08, 2007 IT SUCKS TO LOSE..... Hey we have all been on the loosing end at some point. At the end of the Day, Angela Hunt lost... she did not sell herself or her idea, obviously. Her oversell, and nasty tactics caused me to go vote and VOTE NO... as i believe - many others did. THE BOTTOM LINE - to bad - your going to have to live with a TOLL ROAD with 18 wheelers driving through OUR NASTY SICK A.. what we call a Park. Remember its a FLOOD ZONE, and the Trinity River is probably the Dirtiest river in Texas - that not only Stinks but is full of Rats, Snakes, Aligator Gars. Believe me, noone will be hanging out at this park.
...
written by joseph raines , November 08, 2007 Justin, I am thinking of moving to Austin. I am in my 40s and don't know if I have the patience to see this city turn around. I am so disillusioned with the DNA in Dallas -- business at all cost. At least Austin is progressive. I live in Oak Cliff -- perhaps at a minimum, I should move to East Dallas to be near like-minded folks!
...
written by joseph raines , November 08, 2007 Larry, I hope you are right. I need some hope -- things seem pretty desolate right now.
...
written by Eve , November 08, 2007 Well Rufus, maybe there is a dark side to Darth Mayor. I could go on, but personal attacks are so talk radio... Perhaps we all have a dark side, but a toll way that will NEVER be paid off, never will be a freeway, by the Trinity is not the best plan for our generation to bequeath. Ever wonder why Boston just buried their honkin' highway that ran through their downtown near their water? Interesting that DMN just ran the fact after the election that about 100,000 cars and trucks will use this tollway daily. A far cry from the pretty pictures from the vote no side. I admire people who stand up for what is right despite peer pressure. The Bible is all about ordinary people who do extraordinary things with God's help. Sound familiar?
...
written by Michael M. , November 08, 2007 Thanks, Sam. You and Jim Schutze carried the journalistic torch through the Dark Side of the DMN and D magazine.
...
written by Taylor , November 08, 2007 Sam and Sal, Thanks for all your hard work and I will continue to frequent your sites on a daily basis. You guys have no idea what a breath of fresh air you are when compared to pop-up morning news.
...
written by joyce foreman , November 08, 2007 Sam, I just want to take this opportunity to say that you did a really good job covering the Trinity Project. You gave us the information that the Dallas Morning New and other bloggers would never have shared. What I really liked about your reporting is that you were at some of the debates and could give us firsthand knowledge. I am also very greatful to Angela Hunt for being a public servant not a politician. She represented the concerns of the people against almost all of the elected officials in the southern sector and ended up with 47% of the vote and I think that is remarkable. One of the things that I most admire about her is she was truthful with the people, unlike Mayor Leppert who would look you in the face and lie. I joined TrinityVote in September and my job was to help get out the African American vote in Dallas (not just the southern sector), and when you look at the numbers, we prevailed in traditional African American neighborhoods like Arlington Park, Hamilton Park, Lovefield,South Dallas and West Dallas. Some of the people that are reporting that I did such a bad job probably do not know how to get to these areas of town or their history . Some of these so called political consultants speak of the African American community only as Oak Cliff (the Red Bird Area). Now mind you in the Red Bird Area of town, I was told that, you had the preachers at Friendship West, Concord and IBOC who let Tom Leppert come and speak to their congregations and Leppert told them to vote no. Friendship West even had a flyer produced that said why you should vote no and also had vans carrying people to different polling places to push No cards on election day. I think TrinityVote overall did an excellent job against the odds that were against us and my hope is that this coalition of people will somehow stay together so that we can change Dallas politics to politics of the people. I do not know Angela Hunts's aspirations, bu I would vote her as mayor because I trust her.
...
written by East Dallas Eccentric , November 08, 2007 I originally for another candidate, but Angela won me over even as I was handing out literature at a precinct for the other party. I have seen her in action and in the trenches of our wonderful neighborhoods - can you name a smarter councilmember? Can you name someone with more passion? Can you name someone with more followers?
...
written by Objective Observer , November 08, 2007 Sam, your entry just confirms every negative comment ever said about you. The irony is so thick it's funny. Why give the other side such (additional) ammunition? When you had an opportunity to respond with class in the face of the people's decision, you chose yet again to label anyone who disagrees with you as stupid, dishonest, etc. You are as judgmental and arrogant as those you describe. Look in the mirror. You took your best shot at persuading people, and you lost. The people studied the issues and decided you were wrong. You don't have to agree with them, and you don't have to like it. But you should recognize that those on the other side love this city just as much as you do, and respect them for that and their votes (as they should do the same for you). I encourage you to channel your passion in a constructive manner. Try being FOR something. And when it's over -- win, lose, or draw - be able to pull up a chair and drink a beer with folks who disagree with you. Otherwise, the prophecy of that nagging voice in the back of your mind will surely come true -- you'll be just another screeching, irrelevant hack. You're better than that. At least, I thought so before reading your entry. Let's chalk that up to election hangover and move on. Who's buying that beer?
...
written by LHV , November 08, 2007 Objective Observer, You seem neither. And I disagree with your conclusion.
...
written by Objective Observer , November 08, 2007 And that's my whole point - you can disagree with me (and over 42,000 others - that's a lot of "elites", isn't it?). But you can do it in a respectful manner. When Sam entitles his entry "Suits Over Citizens" and argues that those who disagreed with him are somehow less of a citizen than he is, then he's just being childish. So, kudos to you for having an opinion and stating it in a professional way. My guess is after a few days of sleep Sam will do the same. Time will tell.
...
written by Pete O. , November 08, 2007 Two observations: 1. I didn't see it as much as "suits vs. citizens" as "pickups vs. hybrids" and we know which of those types of vehicles dominate Dallas Roadways. 2. The Vote Yes people lost the battle (the election) but not the war. I predict no toll road or any other high speed roadway will ever -- ever -- be built between the Trinity River levees. I also predict a bridge will never be built linking California and Hawaii, but I'd bet Dallas voters would have approved that idea as well.
...
written by joseph raines , November 09, 2007 Objective Observer, Sam did a good job replying to your message, but I would like to add something -- how gracious has the Vote No side been since the election? I would classify most of them as bitter winners -- shock of all shocks. So before commenting on the inability of someone to be able to let bygones be bygones, I would strongly suggest that you look in the mirror and see if you and the other Vote No people can do the same.
...
written by Oust Sheffie Kadane , November 09, 2007 This is to No. Dallas Voter: I have good news for you. Leppert's mayoral term is not 4 years--it is only 2 years. May 2009 we can kick the guy out. That's just 18 months from now. Is anyone else thinking "Thank God We Didn't Pass The Strong Mayor Referendum"? ---We really dodged a bullet there.
...
written by Branden Helms , November 09, 2007 My election belief about the road is still the same. In the end, this was not about voting out the road. As it has been twice before, this road will be shelved again. In 1974 and 1988, this road was too expensive to build. As the price tag has more than doubled in the past year, the outcome will be the same. We still have numerous phases to go through before any finalizing of plans can go forward. In the end, this election was about one thing. It was about returning honesty to City Hall. It was about telling buisness leaders they no longer run this city, its residents do. It was about more than anything to me telling the Citizens Council their help is no longer needed and us peasant citizens can do it for ourselves. The CC lost a lot of power when the courts said that Dallas would actually go to district representation, rather than the at-larges. Their power waned for the last two decades, but as the mayor race and this election showed, it is starting to crest upwards. It is also disturbing that they have so much influence and power, and nobody knows who exactly their members are. I'm sure everyone has heard that what is good for buisness is good for Dallas. I personally disagree. I look at places like New York or San Fransico that has a lot of bad buissness policies, yet they are a mecca for commerce. The reason is because they are great places to live. It is like the saying that retail follows rooftops. If people like to live in a city, there will be jobs that follow. I like to use the Boeing relocation as an example. They choose Chicago because it's downtown is more vibrant. Chicago isn't a "buisness-freindly" city, but it is a great place to live and visit. Therefore a major buisness chose it instead of us. Meanwhile our downtown isn't vibrant because back in the '50's and 60's and continuing today in some case, buisness decided to do things like build tunnels, ring downtown with freeways, tear down "old" buildings for parking lots and remove streetcars because they were in the way of converting streets to one-ways and that would relieve congestion. In the end, because it was good for buisness, we as citizens got screwed. Putting a road in a supposed world class park is a very buisness type decision. That's what this whole thing was about to me. In the end, we accomplished some things. There will be more transparency on the project, citizens will be more vocal, and promises have to be kept. It is not a total loss, but in the end, we got tackled at the one yard line as time expired. That is why on Thursday, this election still stings. It likely will for a while. In the end, though, I will be more determined. I sometimes get frustrated living in Dallas, because I don't think my views line up with the city. If I lived in the NE or in places like Chicago or Portland, I wouldn't have had to get this involved because it wouldn't make it off the drawing board. Expand that to a global view and include most of the rest of the industrialized world. That's why I was in a small part encouraged to see my precint and downtown as a whole voted yes (as can be seen here,http://enr2.clarityelections.com/De...=0130&pv=false). In a larger view, most of the urban core: downtown, Deep Ellum, parts of Oak Lawn, Junius Heights, Lower Greenville and the Cedars all voted yes. It is encouraging to see people in an urban environment express that at the polls. That said, there is an obvious exclusion. Uptown. The precints in Uptown are a mix. But for the most part, Uptown was more No in nature. That helped confirm a suspicion I have had about the area. While it is in a large degree urban in design, in practice it is not. To me, I have always thought that Uptown is about being seen, having money and being thought of as a big shot. The Ticket had a saying that the ring/courtside seats at Mavs and Stars games are for the cocaine and boob job section. That, to me, describes Uptown. The people there, IMHO, are still in a suburban mindset. There is little walking, less transit use and a lot of driving. The stereotype in downtown is that there aren't people in downtown after 5. I would say, aside from the parking lot to the bar, there is less activity in Uptown. It is still a drive first mentality, and I think that showed in the ballot box.
...
written by larry , November 09, 2007 To Oust Sheffie Kadane: Are you sure that the term for the mayor's office isn't 4 years, instead of 2 for all others on the council? If so, I hope you're right. I know old man Kadane's term will expire in 2009; I very much want to get rid of that fat, worthless sack of hot air. Our district can't lose that dinosaur soon enough. We'd have Jill Kotvis had it not been for Kadane's mudslinging and lies.
...
written by Oust Dave Neumann , November 09, 2007 I have to say I voted for Tom Leppert, but would not do it again. What changed me wasn't his stand on the tollroad, but his tactics and his lies. I attended what was billed as a Trinity forum at Park in the Woods Rec Center prior to the election. It was supposed to be a debate sponsored by Councilman Dave Neumann with Mayor Leppert & Angela Hunt. But Councilman Neumann then "uninvited" Hunt. Attendees were then subjected to a dog and pony show by Leppert & Neumann talking only about the "positives" of the tollway. Although both Angela Hunt & Sam Coates were there, neither was allowed to speak. To make matters even worse, any questions had to be written on index cards and screened by Councilman Neumann before he'd ask them to the Mayor! Needless-to-say, all the questions asked that night were complimentary to the tollroad. I was totally disgusted by these tactics used by Leppert & Neumann and the waste of my time. For that reason, Leppert has permanently lost my support. And I can't wait until Dave Neumann runs again. He only won the last election by 282 votes. It'll take just a fraction of 'VOTE YES' supporters who voted for this sham councilman to switch their votes and throw him out of office.
...
written by Sharon Boyd , November 09, 2007 The Mayor is elected for 4 years and can serve 2 terms (8 years). Councilmembers are elected for 2 years and can serve 4 terms (8 years). There were more things wrong w/Jill Kotvis for city council than what came out in the campaign. Dist 9 would be best served by Roxan Staff on the city council, rather than the likes of Sandra Dee Griffith or Kadane or Kotvis. The TrinityVote Yes team did a great job. Our goal was to stop a $1.4 Billion road being built in a floodway (not a floodplain). It looks like we accomplished just that. Sam, your investigative reporting has put a light on the rats' nest. We did not have to win the election to stop the toll road between the levees. Thank you for all you did.
...
written by larry , November 10, 2007 Sharon, [NOTE to all:This is District 9 commentary...others may ignore if they so desire] I voted for Roxan twice in her race against Griffith. There is no question she was the far better candidate, and his performance in office removed any doubt. That said, Jill Kotvis was our choice against Kadane. There is also no question she was the better candidate. However, we are where we are now. We are stuck with the hypocritical old fool Kadane until 2009. If Roxan would be willing to run against him then, I damn sure would fully support her. Roxan, if you are reading this, I hope you will consider another run. We need you and badly. Write comment
|
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
