| Sanity Prevails |
|
|
|
| by Rufus Shaw | Thu, Aug 23, 2007, 12:04 PM |
|
The potentially racially explosive vote that threatened to derail the new Leppert Administration’s honeymoon of harmony took place at City Hall Wednesday as the City Council voted to remove community activist, Joyce Foreman, from the DART Board. With a vote of 8 to 7, the council replaced Ms. Foreman with the Chairman of the African-American Pastor’s Coalition, Dr. Jerry Christian. What made this vote so important is what Ms. Foreman and City Councilwoman Vonceil Hill did to try to get Ms. Foreman re-appointed. Ms. Foreman’s tactics not only threatened the entire Black political agenda but they also showed us that if we are going to be politically successful, sanity must prevail. As I have written in past columns, Joyce Foreman, in an effort to regain her seat on the DART Board, embarked on an unprecedented campaign that included threatening two Black City Council members with being removed from office in the next election. She threatened to have the Black community picket and march on City Hall if she were not re-appointed. She had numerous people in the community call City Council members suggesting that all would not be well with the Black community if Ms. Foreman was not returned to the DART Board. I dare say that most of the Black community had no idea their politics were being used in this way by Ms. Foreman. I was told by one political insider at City Hall that Ms. Foreman even called one white City Council member a racist because he refused to support her. Never mind that this same white City Council member supported all 3 of the other African-Americans on the DART Board, including the Black man who replaced Ms. Foreman. Joyce Foreman had every right to lobby council members to get enough votes to remain on the DART Board. She had every right to call on members of the Black political community to support her efforts. What she did not have the right to do is to threaten the City Council with pickets and protest if she were not re-appointed. Ms. Foreman did not have the right to put the Black community’s political capital in play for her own personal benefit. Joyce Foreman has spent years as a community volunteer. She deserves our respect and appreciation for her years of service. But somehow, Joyce Foreman deluded herself into believing that she was entitled to this DART Board appointment. Even more bizarre, Mr. Foreman considered herself worthy of mass support from the Black political community. Yet, she has never been considered a powerful Black political personality. As a matter of fact, Joyce Foreman’s record on the DART Board is no more progressive or Black community friendly then the other Black DART Board members. The notion, promoted by Ms. Foreman, that the Black community will suffer if she is not on the DART Board is as factually untrue as it is delusional. During her campaign, Ms. Foreman and her supporters, failed to mention that Black, Hispanic, and Anglo political players opposed her being reappointed to the DART Board because, in their opinion, she was not only unnecessarily combative but some even questioned her effectiveness. For example, the DART voting records will show that Ms. Foreman’s ability to deliver, especially in the area of minority business development, was inconsistent and not near as important to the Black community as she would have one believe. The African-American political community must face some hard facts. First off, we are not the most powerful voting bloc in the city. That title belongs to the Anglo community. Secondly, we are not the largest minority group in the city. That title belongs to the Hispanic community. Because of our unique political position, we must now more then ever play smart politics. The dysfunctional politics of the past that Joyce Foreman and City Councilwoman Vonceil Hill practiced during this DART nominating process will no longer get us where we need to go. How could Black City Council members possibly be taken seriously on issues like crime, code enforcement, and southern sector economic development when there are parties in the Black community willing to use all of our political capital for one person’s DART Board appointment? The
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (6)
![]()
...
written by wondering , August 24, 2007 Rufus Where do you get your information? Most of it is incorrect, but you are known for that. We do know that you no longer write for a paper and on the blog you can write whatever you want even if it is not the truth. I will put my record up against any DART board member in helping minorities get contracts, jobs and resolving issues. The difference in me and others is that I am not trying to make the opportunities available for only a few people. I believe my job is to open the door for everyone. You have every right to have any opinion of me that you wish, but you are not the person who defines the Black agenda, and the few blacks that worked for Leppert are not the one's that define the Black agenda either.I will put my record of working for and delivering to the black community up against yours or anyone that you suggest. I have worked tirelessly for what I believe is best for my community. That is what is wrong with our community today, people like you trying to speak for the entire Black community. We re not monolithic. I could list a number of people who totally disagree with your ideas and agenda. Councilwoman Voncil Hill and I had every right to lobby and we were supported by many people in the community. Dwayne Caraway and Tenell Adkins lobbied to replace me. I know you are not suggesting that they had the right to lobby but we did not. I understand Dwayne lobbying, because he made it clear that he was going after people who supported Maxine Thornton Reese (who defeated him 3 times), but Tennell Adkins is a person I helped in his race against Charles Rose because he was a friend of Darrell Jordan. It was a shock to me that he would act in the manner that he did. Working five hard years to become the chairman of DART and being taken out a month before the election by councilmen who have only been on the council since June (2 MONTHS)is a big disappointment, but God has a bigger plan for me. I contine to b e prayerful about this situation and hope that God will show me the good that will come out of it. I know you think that Dwayne and Tenell did the community a favor, but many community people (black,white and Hispanic) do not feel that way, and that includes many DART employees and some DART board members. TIME WILL TELL IF WHAT HAPPENED WILL BENEFIT THE BLACK COMMUNITY OR A FEW BLACKS. Joyce Foreman
...
written by Sam Merten , August 24, 2007 Read some interesting comments from Foreman... http://tinyurl.com/2tc4ng
...
written by Sharon Boyd , August 24, 2007 As someone who is not Black and likes Dwaine and Joyce, I see things from an outsider's view. Dallas has come a long way when there are more than just a handful of Black leaders to fill community boards and commission seats. Joyce would have been a good DART chair, but all board and commission appointments are political. When the candidate you back loses or you get crosswise with an elected official, your own political clout is diminished. You have to expect and accept it and go in a different direction. Lordi Palmer shut me out years ago for disagreeing with her. Joyce is a smart, talented woman, and God does have another plan for her. Dwaine and Tennell are also smart and talented, and they hold the power now. It's still good for Dallas when there is more than one clique in control of all things related to the Black community. I didn't support her, but Carolyn Davis is showing an independence that is refreshing and gives us all hope. Voncill Hill has already shown me I was right to support Betty Culbreath. Dwaine and Tennell have differed big time in the past, but now work together on the council. It's good when you have 4 Black council members who think for themselves.
...
written by Michael Davis , August 24, 2007 Correction: Dwaine lost to Maxine twice, Maxine beat Larry Duncan in 2001 by 16 votes and Roetta Crayton in 1999. Jerry Christian supported Maxine also.
...
written by Rufus Shaw , August 24, 2007 I will address all of the comments on this column in my column next week. However, I will say this. I am amused that Ms. Foreman would be so critical of my work now that I have exposed some unflattering aspects of her performance. Yet, I have been one of her biggest cheerleaders in the past and during that time I was never critized by Ms.Foreman. As a matter of fact, I don't know of anybody who has written more positive stories about Joyce Foreman then I have including those who write for Black newspapers. And I find it even more interesting that Ms. Foreman and others would evoke the fact that I no longer write for a Black newspaper as if somehow that makes my work less credible. I spent 30 plus years writing for Black newspapers and all of our critics complained that we had no journalistic integrity and nobody was reading us. Now since I write on this blog, some of my critics are inferring that Black newspapers have become well read paragons of journalistic integrity! I hope they support Black newspapers with advertising dollars and readership and not just attempt to use them to make points in a losing arguement. Write comment
|
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|






















