No account yet?
Subscription Options
Subscribe via RSS, or
 
Free Email Alert

Sign up to receive a daily e-mail alert with links to Dallas Blog posts.

New Site Search
Login
Bill DeOre
Click for Larger Image
Dallas Sports Blog
Local Team Sports News
NBA.com: Mavericks News
Texas Rangers News
DallasCowboys.com
FC Dallas News
Stars Recent Headlines
Good News Dallas
Just Politics PDF Print E-mail
by Rufus Shaw    Fri, Jun 22, 2007, 01:45 PM

As some political spin doctors get a hold of the numbers and begin the process of justifying their failed political strategies in the recent mayoral election, let me take a shot at interpreting the numbers.  Let’s take a look at the phrase it is “just politics” and see how it is being used to justify Dallas’ most negative and nastiest mayoral campaign. Let me be clear about what I am doing.  First, I am not interested in being powerful, nor am I a great guy. I have highlighted John Price in a number of my columns because for years Mr. Price and his followers have styled him as the most dominant Black political personality in town.  As far as they are concerned, all Black politics must flow through John Price.  I disagree with that notion. I have never said that Mr. Price is finished.  He is just greatly diminished.  Most folks are afraid to write negative stories about Mr. Price and his group.  I am not.  If you don’t believe what I am writing, ignore my stuff and read some of the other fine political columnists on DallasBlog. But negative attacks against me will not stop me from writing the truth. As for whether or not I am telling the truth, investigate for yourself.  Finally, I would like to briefly introduce the newly elected Black City Council members.

The latest spin is that Leppert won the white vote while Oakley supposedly won 69% of the Black vote thus somehow justifying the negative campaign conducted in the Black community by the John Price group.  The figure that those people who opposed Leppert would like to forget is that the Black vote was down 4%.  What that means to me is enough Black voters were turned off by Oakley’s life style, could not see themselves voting for the new Republican guy, and/or could not stomach the negative advertising so they chose to stay at home.  Every Black voter that stayed at home hurt Ed Oakley.  Those of us who follow Black politics realize it was a miracle for Tom Leppert to overcome such demonization and still get 31% of the Black vote.  Nobody who follows Black politics expected Tom Leppert to battle Ed Oakley for the majority of the Black vote.

The John Price group led the charge in demonizing Tom Leppert. Leppert was portrayed as a Republican, white crook who poisoned Black school children. By unfairly manipulating Black folks’ worst fears, the Oakley campaign had hoped for a massive Black voter turn out which is what Ed Oakley needed to offset Tom Leppert in the north.  With that fact in mind, just because a southern sector Democrat who had a good legislative record in the southern sector got 69% of a low Black voter turn-out does not mean that the folks handling Ed Oakley’s Black affairs did a good job. Quite the contrary, by engaging in questionable campaign tactics the John Price group cost Ed Oakley the kind of turn out he needed in the Black community and invigorated white voters in the north.  Interestingly, Mr. Price reportedly is now telling a number of white Republican financiers who backed Tom Leppert that Price’s actions were “just politics”.  You see a lot of those wealthy Republican Leppert supporters have also been financial supporters of Commissioner Price.  I wonder will they continue to support him after he figuratively spit in their faces during this election. I wonder what those diehard Democrats and Black folks who can’t stand Republicans think of Mr. Price’s longtime love affair with Republican money.  I also wonder if those people who were complaining about how Ed Oakley was treated in the media ever stop to think what effect the dishonest negative advertising had on Tom Leppert’s children.  I mean to see your dad falsely accused of being a crook and a person who poisons Black school children certainly wasn’t “just politics” to them.

Now here are the new Black city council members. The most remarkable campaign was in District 8 where Tennell Atkins beat Charles Rose.  What was remarkable is the coalition Mr. Atkins put together. He was endorsed by former District 8 City Council members James Fantroy and Al Lipscomb. Not only did Mr. Fantroy and Mr. Lipscomb endorse Mr. Atkins, they both actively worked in his campaign.  Mr. Atkins has big shoes to fill.

Community activist Carolyn Davis was able to win District 7 to replace Leo Chaney, Jr. by beating Rev. Donald Parrish, Sr.  Rev. Parrish’s ties to the controversial eminent domain advocate, Don Williams, saddled Rev. Parrish’s campaign with the negative perception that he was handpicked to take Black folk’s property for Don Williams.  Ms. Davis put together a nice coalition of Black community folks and white Pleasant Grove voters.

In District 5, Don Hill’s seat, Vonceil Hill beat Betty Culbreath.  Ms. Hill is the only City Council candidate who is directly tied to the John Price group.  Her detractors feel that she will be no more then a hot tempered divisive council member who will race bait issues in order to carry John Price’s water.  I prefer to wait and see if Ms. Hill will use her considerable intellect to move District 5 and the southern sector forward.

And finally, Dwaine Caraway, who was the only Black City Council member that did not need a run off, replaces Maxine Thornton-Reese in District 4.  Mr. Caraway went out on a political limb by seriously campaigning for Tom Leppert.  His gamble paid off.  Mr. Caraway is the closest Black City Council member to Mayor Leppert. That is how I see it from South of the Trinity.

Comments (18)add comment
...
written by Henry , June 22, 2007

Mr. Shaw,

You have repeatedly written about Mr. Oakley's "life style" as if it were a choice of some sort (which it is not). I would hope that you are not one of the misguided black folk who, for whatever reason, cannot come to terms with the fact that we gay folks (and I proudly am a black gay male) are not going anywhere, are unapologetic, and are fed up with bigoted behavior from a group (allegedly God-fearing Christian folk) who not so long ago fought vigorously for equal rights for themselves. If you want to speak the truth, speak to the homophobia that is condoned by many in the black community. Hold the new guard in the city council accountable for ensuring that gay rights are protected by the city. Use this forum to get the the black ministers of the mega-churches to welcome and embrace all of God's children. And if the best we will get is the tired "God hates the sin but not the sinner" line, don't bother. We have heard it before and it is meaningless.



...
written by Sharon Boyd , June 22, 2007

The best thing I can say about Dwaine Caraway is that he reaches out to people that he has crossed or vice versa. If you had told me a few years ago, I would consider him a friend today -- well, you wouldn't have. Dwaine builds bridges and humbles himself. Not bad traits in a politician.

When Betty Culbreath almost died this time last year from that botched colonoscopy, Dwaine was at her side at the hospital almost 24/7. If he hadn't already won me over, that would have been enough.

It would have been awkward for Dwaine and Mitch Rasansky had Ed Oakley been elected mayor. He and Mitch had little to lose and much to gain by supporting Tom Leppert. Both of them would have been dead meat on the council had Ed won.

Wish Betty C could have carried Dist 5, but hopefully Vonceil Hill will surprise us and do a good job.



...
written by Rufus Shaw , June 23, 2007

Jack Jett
Instead of trying to figure out a label for me why don't you simply read what I have to say and investigate for yourself whether or not it is the truth. If you are incapable of doing that, then don't continue to tax yourself trying to figure me out, read one of the other very good columnist on this blog.



...
written by Henry , June 23, 2007

Mr. Shaw,

I am assuming that you inadvertently didn't see my post, and that at some point in the not too distant future, you will share with the readers your thoughts on how Dallas' black citizens, black ministers, and you view the gay community. How much impact did any homophobia by the community have on the election? Any thoughts on why some blacks aren't fond of gays (beyond "the Bible says it is a sin" argument)? What are the stances of the new council members in terms of gays in Dallas? Do they plan to participate in gay pride parades? Any insight would be most welcome. Thanks.



...
written by Rufus Shaw , June 23, 2007

Henry,
I don't believe a person should be discriminated against because of their sexual preference. I have said that in several of my columns. However, many in the Black faith based community are no different from the white faith base community in viewing homosexuality as a sin. Those who believe that most certainly voted against Ed Oakley or they did not vote at all. I don't know of any new Black City Council member who is anti-gay. Since you are Black, you must know that the Black community does not tend to concentrate on gay issues since we have so many other issues to deal with.



...
written by Imogene Yuss , June 24, 2007

Rufus:

Blacks and gays have worked together for equal rights for years. I don't know where you have been while this has been taking place. I have marched with blacks for racial equality. You sound like you might be caught up in this Republican BS where you think they might make you a political star. Those 15 minutes have passed and they have enough blacks to stand on the dais to "look" diverse. You and I know there is a difference between being diverse and looking it.

Perhaps you are caught up in the religious aspect of this and if that is the case, then you are a lost cause. Those folks aren't able to put together a single rational thought without looking in the bible for a scripture they can twist to make it fit what they want to believe.

I remember how proud I was of the Byrd family after that fiasco in Jasper Texas. I remember how the Mother held her head up high and demanded that the GLBT community be part of the Byrd hate crime bill.

It baffles me when those have been so oppressed turn around and begin to oppress others.

There is no doubt in my mind that if there is a hell, Jerry Falwell is burning to a crip there at this writing.

Imogene Yuss



...
written by Henry , June 24, 2007

Rufus,

You write that "the Black community does not tend to concentrate on gay issues since we have so many other issues to deal with." That is not an excuse to ignore gay issues, as they affect so many in the Black community. Name one black person you know who does not have a gay son, daughter, cousin, aunt, uncle, friend, husband or wife (whether they admit it or not). We ARE a part of the black community and are not going away. I hope that you, through your columns, get that message out. I am new to this blog and have not read your previous columns discussing discrimination based on "sexual preference". If I may, I would like to educate you on word choice -- you used the term "sexual preference" -- a more appropriate term would be "sexual orientation" or "sexual identity". We no more chose our sexuality than straight people did; "sexual preference" implies that a choice or decision was made (it was not).

Additionally, I hope that you do not think that I am giving white homophobic people of faith a pass -- I am not. They are guilty as well. However, I feel that as a Black, I need to call us to task, especially given our past. I will be closely watching the new council members and mayor -- unlike you, I do not have a warm and fuzzy feeling that they will watch out for gay folks' interest. I hope that I am proven wrong. And since I am guessing that you are well-connected to the powerful black ministers in the city (Haynes, Rush, Jakes et al), I think it would be great to encourage them to make more of an outreach to the gay community (without judgment) and drop the "sinner-sin" and "sexual preference" mindset.



...
written by Rufus Shaw , June 24, 2007

Imogene Yuss,
I don't know where you have been but you obviously have not been around here for the past 40 years. If you had, you would know that I don't need the Republican Party to make me a star. I have been well known in the sports and entertainment field most of my life. I have no interest in becoming a political star.
I am a life long Democrat. Yet, I find it amazing when a Black man espouses a view that many Republicans and Democrats might share I am automatically labeled a Republican. You sound like one of those white Democrats who are quick to demonize any Black person that dares to agree with Republcians on issues. Although,for people like you, it is alright for white Democrats to agree with their fellow white Republicans on issues. Just like I am sure you don't condem gay white Republicans. You obviously have not read many of my other columns where Republicans vehemently disagree with me. And by the way, a number of groups marched with African-Americans not just gays.
I have been as open as I can about my position on not believing that gays should be discriminated against. If you choose to critize me because I have not taken a more zealous position on this issue, that is your business.I think you will find that your strategy of berating any Black person that does not agree with your agenda will not win you many supporters in the Black community. If you want to create new enemies for the gay community,you are doing a good job. Having said that,I have no interest in my column becoming a comment forum for gay issues. Read somebody else.



...
written by Jonathan Green Dallas Count Voter. , June 25, 2007

Good Day to Mr. Shaw, Your article on Mr. Price is clearly filled with factual information that many in the African American Communities as well as the voting commuinity was not aware of. I for many years has seen Mr. Price change under the auspice that is "untouchable". This apparent label stems from his recent successes in the previeous races he has won. However, what must be considered is the fact tht no viable candidate with strong ties in the community viewed that seat as a powerful seat similar to the City Council seat. Mr. Price has shown repeatedly that he can be bought. I recall some years ago an article Mr. Price wrote a brief synopsis of the article states, "uppity and most gracious are two words most commonly associated with the Anglo American" I say this phrase points to Mr. Price who now proudly wears the hat of a Uncle Tom. Strong words, however, fact is, he failed to put his record before the community of how African Americans have been awarded County Contracts, why Parkland has illegial immigrants populating its medical facilitates and creating rising costs for Dallas County citizens. In addition, the lame excuses from Mr. Price and his people "every body runs to me like I can save Dallas". I recall Mr. Price campaign slogan, "Your Man Downtown". However, Mr. Price has proved the opposite, House Slave, governed by tokism!


...
written by The Word , June 25, 2007

To Imogene Yuss, I would rather rely on the Bible than your rhetorical. In fact, the book of Leviticus 2110.84 clearly illustrates my perception about your understandings of religion. You see, I am man provisioned under the blood, and being provisioned under the blood removes any discontent I hold towards you.


...
written by Quoted From Malcom X , June 25, 2007

"To Know me, you must go back to the day of my birth". Malcom X. Admire your style Rufus.


...
written by sandra crenshaw , June 26, 2007

I was busy during the runoff and missed these negatives ads that Oakley purportedly conducted. Can anyone describe the falsehoods point by point. There is a difference between comparison pieces and informational pieces. I don't recall this much backlash from the ads that Max Wells did describing Leppert's past business
dealings, in fact I think Wells broke the stories. I would like a Leppert response to these allegations. I'll take them from supporters.

I think Leppert is a warm person, he certainly looks and feels mayorial but I know that ignorance is bliss. I hope he doesn't leave city hall disillusioned competing with the 14 minimayors we have in our weak mayorial government. What do you want to bet, he'll join the last four mayors in bellyaching about wanting to "do something" and can't."



...
written by Linus Spiller , June 26, 2007

Henry/Imogene/Rufus:

This has been a very interesting thread here, one that has morphed from the title "Just Politics" to one dealing with sexual orientation.

As a Black gay man, I was completely turned off by the Ed Oakley campaign tactics we all just witnessed, but unlike the southern sector voters Rufus mentioned that probably didn't bother to vote, I did vote and supported Tom Leppert without reservation. And the reason why: his business track record. Ed's record on the council paled compared to Tom's business experience, which is needed to revitalize Dallas and bring much needed economic development to the southern sector.

Henry's sentiments, about the issue of sexual orientation being a divisive issue in this campaign, are shared by many gays and lesbians in Dallas. I agree, it shouldn't have. It should have remained which candidate brought better credentials to the table to serve as our leader.

What I don't agree with is any segment of our city supporting, voting for, or voting against any candidate based solely on who they are, whether gay or lesbian, black, white or latino, male or female, northern resident or southern resident, Republican or Democrat.

Those points of identification may be appealing, but as an electorate, we have to be more educated about who we are putting in those offices because the decisions they can have long time effects and repercussions.

With this in mind, while I do not support the tactics used by certain influential black leaders in the southern sector to sway the opinion of Mr. Oakley in favor of Mr. Leppert on the basis of Oakley's sexual orientation, I firmly believe the right man was elected.

I recently was in attendance at an informal home gathering of black gays and lesbians and when the discussion turned to the results of the recent election, all were shocked that I had supported a non-gay candidate, "our candidate." When I tried to educate them on the merits of Leppert and the significance of his being in office to the southern sector, I was met with extreme defiance that had NOTHING to do with the credentials of either candidates.

That made no sense to me, but it illustrates an important point: black folk, gay, straight or indifferent have got to start becoming more diligent in researching the individuals who seek our vote. We are too easily lead astray by campy radio ads or flashy campaign literature supporting candidates who should not be representing us or the city of Dallas.

Rufus has the right to dictate what he will or will not address in his column. That is his choice.

For others who want to address the gay and lesbian issue in the black community, nothing is stopping you from doing so. From 1995 - 1998, I actively engaged the Black community on LGBT issues with other black leaders from the community. It was brutal but what made it worse was the lack of support we had from members of the Black LGBT community who were content to let us fight alone.

When Dallas was the host city for the 1996 National Black Lesbian and Gay Leadership Forum Conference, with the exception of the few of us, the conference was facilitated by individuals from the East and West coasts. Dallas support was visibly lacking, except for the parties, which were standing room only. Everybody wants freedom from oppression but most are unwilling to pay the costs associated with that freedom.

Those three years burned me out and now I am content to let the Black community hold whatever view they want on the issue of sexual orientation. I will do the occasion radio show on KHVN to discuss LGBT issues, but now I mostly live my life so that clarity might be seen in how I conduct my life and not spoken. Plus, I have two sons and four grandkids to worry about, so my time can't be spent trying to educate others on who I am in order for me to be comfortable. I accept me, believe God accepts me and that's plenty.



...
written by DPS grad , June 26, 2007

how old are Lepperts kids? What schools do they go to?


...
written by Henry , June 27, 2007

Linus,

As a fellow black gay man, I appreciate the diversity of thought in our community. You have every right to support and vote for whomever you so choose. I think you missed the boat by jumping on the Leppert bandwagon, but only time will tell if the "great white hope" from north Dallas [who won because (1) he had deep pockets, (2) homophobes in the city (including many black ministers) hated the thought of a gay mayor, and (3) people were looking for a saviour], can work miracles. I expect nothing less.

Like you, I try to live my life as an example to others, but please do not think that your existence will have any impact on the homophobic people we all seek to influence.

As far as Rufus writing on whatever he so chooses in his column, he certainly has that right. I think that it is a sad commentary that he chooses to ignore us and that you are giving him a pass. Perhaps the answer here is for me to become a columnist so that I can focus on these topics, since we obviously can't rely on anyone else to do the right thing.....



...
written by sandra crenshaw , June 27, 2007

come on linus and others, spell out t me the campaign tactic s that you did not like or thoought were negative.
I missed it and I would like to know what happened?



...
written by Mary Hasan , June 28, 2007

If I am not mistaken, didn't Ed spend 1.8 million. I wouldn't call that chicken feed. Didn't he have tv ads and I received mailers atleast twice a week, sometimes 2 pieces of junk mail a day.

I am glad this election is over. The one thing that I learned during this election is that a lot of gays feel that if you disagree with them then you are antigay. Say what you want about the republicans but that have never tried to make me vote for anyone. They have never called me a liar, thief or whore simply because I didn't vote for one of them.

Henry you talk about blacks being homophobic. You can't down people because of their religious beliefs and think that it's going to win them over.

Linus, you are absolutely right. We should vote for people because we feel they are the best person for the job. People who I don't even know talked about me for not supporting Ed. I was called antigay even after I stated why Iwas not voting for Ed. It did not matter that I had voted for him before. It did not matter that I stood outside Brown school from the time the polls open to the time they closed for Ed. All that mattered to most of the gays who were blogging on this site was that I didn't support him this time. I have been a democrat all my life but now I am seriously considering registering as an independent. People were saying that Ed would be pushing the gay agenda. I don't know what that agenda is but I do know that this election left a bad taste in my mouth. It appeared to me that if you disagree or believe in something that is contraty to what the gays believe or want, then you are demonized. I have had political disagreement before but nothing like this. You need to understand that you can't make people change by belittling them or calling them names. It only turns them off. I have a lot of friends who read this blog and believe me a lot of you also lost Ed votes by your action. I hated the thought of voting for someone whose word meat nothing. I met with Leppert and I was impressed by him, his attitude and his dream for this city which is why I supported him. I will never vote for Ed again regardly of what any of you say.










...
written by Henry , June 28, 2007

Mary,

My intent is not to berate people who don't agree with me. However, I find it interesting that if we gays don't give straight people a pass on their actions, we are considered horrible and unfair. My question to you and anyone else who feels the way you do -- should we be quiet gays and smile and wait for you all to come around? I don't think so. We're here, we're queer, get used to it. My goal in life is not to win over hard-core homophobic people -- they need to go to therapy or pray to their God for enlightenment. I would challenge you (and those so quick to throw stones at us) to try to understand us (as opposed to finding fault with us and then using flimsy reasons to justify seemingly anti-gay speech and actions). If I had a dollar for every time I heard "I don't have a problem with gay people. I just don't want to hear about them. They are always in your face", I would be a wealthy gay man.

I hope that Leppert is everything that you want him to be. I look forward to chatting with you a year from now when he has made a mess of city hall. Ed will look pretty good to those of you who chose not to vote for him (for whatever reason -- only you know why you abandoned him).

Unapologetically gay and proud of it, Henry.




Write comment
smaller | bigger
password
 

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

© 2010 Dallasblog.com, the Dallas, Texas news blog and Dallas, Texas information source for the DFW Metroplex. - DALLAS BLOG
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.