| It Was Leppert Who Made History |
|
|
|
| by Rufus Shaw | Sun, Jun 17, 2007, 12:48 PM |
|
The run up to this run off was all about the possibility that Ed Oakley would make history by being the first openly gay mayor to head a major U. S. city. Instead, it was Tom Leppert who made Dallas political history by getting more Black votes than any white candidate who had ever been demonized by a Democratic opponent as a Republican who would do harm to the Black community. Leppert’s historic win showcased his ability to build a diverse political base and his win signaled the end of the John Price group as a dominant political force in Black Dallas. I don’t have all of the numbers yet, but it is pretty clear that Tom Leppert received more Black votes than most political watchers ever thought he would get and far more votes than Ed Oakley could stand to give up. How did he do it? First, Leppert proved on the campaign trail that he was comfortable being around African-Americans and thus, Black folks were comfortable with Tom Leppert. Second, the Willis Johnson group who ran Leppert’s southern sector campaign was extremely effective in introducing Tom Leppert to the Black community. Third, Tom Leppert owes a debt of gratitude to the Ed Oakley campaign for going negative. Somebody told Ed Oakley to demonize Tom Leppert as a Republican who would abuse the Black community. That strategy might have worked if Mr. Oakley had been a Black Democrat. But it would hardly have the same impact on Black voters when the race was between two white men. But once the race went negative, Leppert’s Black supporters were forced to defend their position by pointing out that Ed Oakley was gay. Of course, many pundits are now trying to play down just how much of an issue Mr. Oakley’s lifestyle was for local voters. The reality is that Black faith-based voters are conservative when it comes to sexual issues. Ed Oakley’s lifestyle hurt him with conservative Black voters more then Tom Leppert being a Republican in a non partisan election. Let me say for the record: I don’t think Ed Oakley’s lifestyle should have been an issue for voters, but the fact is for a large segment of Black voters, it was an undeniable issue. Oakley’s campaign also made the critical mistake of bringing on the John Price group to handle his Black affairs. The John Price group was fresh off of having destroyed Max Well’s efforts in the southern sector. From what I heard out of the Oakley camp, Kathy Neely and Demetris Sampson of the John Price group quickly created all kinds of catfights and chaos inside the Oakley campaign. I still don’t quite understand why Ed Oakley kicked to the curb some of his most loyal, long time political allies to make room for the John Price group. But once Mr. Price came aboard, the anti- John Price factions in the Black community were immediately energized to go out and beat the John Price group. So, what should have been an easy task of mobilizing black southern sector voters to support Ed Oakley became a continuation of the political civil war being waged in the southern sector between the John Price group and just about every other Black political group South of the Trinity. Here are some highlights from the campaign: City Councilman elect, Dwaine Caraway, and his wife, State Rep. Barbara Mallory-Caraway, gave the Leppert campaign street savvy grass roots political credibility in the southern sector by walking with Leppert in their Oak Cliff districts. Rev. Freddie Haynes III endured insults and second guessing but he held strong as Leppert’s earliest, high-profiled Black supporter. Lynn Flint-Shaw organized the “Super Sunday Get Out The Vote” event that provided a large percentage of Black voters for Leppert and gave the Leppert campaign an early indication that they would not be run out of the southern sector. Rev. Rickie Rush surprised everyone by not showing up for the Super Sunday event that he co-sponsored but he made up for his absence by sending an unprecedented 600 plus voters from his church to early vote on the last two days of early voting. Most of those votes went to Tom Leppert. There are several stories and personalities that emerged in the southern sector during this campaign. I will highlight them all in the coming weeks. Tom Leppert’s campaign did make history in Dallas politics by proving that a white candidate who is sincere and not afraid of being around Black folks and who puts together the right team can overcome political labels and do well in the Black community. For you John Wiley Price watchers, he is not completely dead politically but the last few elections prove conclusively that John Price, Kathy Neely, and Demetris Sampson who make up the core of the John Price group, are no longer dominant political forces in Black Dallas. At least that is how I see it from South of the Trinity.
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (42)
![]()
...
written by Sharon Boyd , June 17, 2007 JWP, et al, don't work for free, and they aren't worth half of what they charged. Dwaine Caraway should be Mayor Pro Tem. He and Tom Leppert will be a great team. Over the last 6 years, I have done a 90 degree change in my attitude toward Dwaine. The guy is amazing. You couple Tom and Dwaine with Dave Neumann's high energy, and the Southern Sector is actually going to see some changes in the near future -- changes that help the little guy, as well as "economic development". We missed you last night, Rufus. Keep getting better.
...
written by Ron Gilchrist , June 17, 2007 This race was not about gay vs. anti-gay considerations. People will be surprised to learn that a good number of gay Democrats voted for Leppert because Oakley's negative ads were a turn-off to everyone. Leppert brings a fresh, positive point of view to the city. And, Oakley showed his true colors in the final weeks of the election when he tried to rezone Jack Pierce's property and then refused to recuse himself on a key zoning case presented by his biggest donors--the Crow family.
...
written by Gehrig M. Saldaña , June 17, 2007 Stealing and covering your opponent's campaign signs might have gotten a laugh from Ed Oakley campaign volunteer and/or independent campaign operatives who worked Dallas' Southern Sector and Dallas' Oak Cliff neighborhoods. However, those tactics did not gain favor among the thousands of Dallas citizens who saw what kind of democracy in action those individuals displayed to Dallas' voters. The City of Dallas will now have one less minority class at the horseshoe table. For that, partial credit goes to those who interjected partisan politics into Dallas' mayoral election and those who thought Dallas Southern Sector voters would wholeheartedly support negative, divisive politics as a means to obtain votes for Ed Oakley.
...
written by Right Wing Republican Volunteer , June 17, 2007 As usual, noted author and social commentator Rufus Shaw has provided exceptional insight into the Dallas political process. More, more!!!
...
written by democrat who voted for Leppert , June 17, 2007 I agree with Saldana. I didnt like Ed's negativity and I am angry that the party endorsed. It weakened the democratic party's name.
...
written by asmith , June 17, 2007 Mr. Shaw Tom still lost those precincts, but did very well in them. Leppert kept his North Dallas base in line. They had no where to go anyway. I happen to be an african american who grew up in North Dallas. The Democratic endorsement motivated Leppert voters who live in preston hollow and surrounding areas. I congratulate Tom, and hope with new council members Dallas can turn the page and change.
...
written by Oaklawn Voter , June 17, 2007 Bigoted blacks beat gay. That is the real headline of this election.
...
written by Michael Davis , June 17, 2007 Rufus, wish you could've been there last night. It was a very diverse crowd. It was hard turning around voters that had their minds made up because of the flyers, but at least everyone did enough to ensure a victory. That being said, I've never see such a nasty campaign in my life. I was offended by the number of nasty mailers directed towards Black voters by other Blacks. I never got the "Ed Oakley has been with us for years" commercial. It didn't jibe with history. Leppert was a class act not to respond in-kind and won anyway. Now we can move forward. I am optimistic about a council that will include Dwaine, Tom, Angela Hunt, Carolyn Davis (although I liked Rev. Parish as well) and Dave Neumann among others.
...
written by gimmeabreak , June 17, 2007 Saldana and Gilchrist have nailed it. A point that is somewhat lost is that a lot of independents, Democrats and gays voted for Leppert because of the nasty, unprofessional tenor of the Oakley campaign. I was at the Leppert victory party for about 45 minutes and was amazed at the number of Democrats and gays who were there. They simply said, "enough is enough with the bitter, bitchy mailers etc." Perhaps one can better understand the crossover appeal when you look at how the candidates sited their victory parties. Oak Lawn gay candidate held his in -- the Design District in Oak Lawn. Park Cities/North Dallas corporate CEO candidate held his at -- a country western bar south of downtown. That's the reaching out Leppert was talking about all throughout the campaign.
...
written by Linus Spiller , June 18, 2007 re: written by Oaklawn Voter , June 17, 2007 - "Bigoted blacks beat gay. That is the real headline of this election." ...And after that butt kicking Ed Oakley just received, the gay and lesbian community just does not get it! A little over a week ago, the Dallas Voice, the gay community's newspaper ran a story whose headline read "South Dallas voters put on auction block" (see DV archive, page 6 - - http://161.58.61.187/artman/archive/06-08-2007.pdf). As an African American, I was outraged and wrote a scathing response entitled 'Column inflames Blacks' mistrust', which was printed a day before the June 12th elections (see DV Viewpoints:Letters - - http://www.dallasvoice.com/art...e_5829.php). As an out homosexual who has worked in the gay community for years (I dislike that 'out' distinction because it seems to denote superiority when I consider myself like everyone else - - a hint Oakley would have been wise to heed in this election), to put Councilman Hill or any other black elected official on blast and take 'sudden interest' in the well-being of a Black community you have always ignored just because you are desperate to win an election was a huge affront. Equally disturbing was the Dallas County Democratic Party's endorsement, which should not have taken place. I am SO GLAD my brothers and sisters in the southern sector STOOD UP and told the DCDP and those Black leaders who continually sell us out their vote was not to be taken for granted and to come up with a better strategy than those 'played out' KHVN commercials with their so called "ode to every thing black and nostalgic" themes. So Shaw, even though I no longer live in the southern sector, it is home and I am a northern ally in this political southern sector civil war you described. We are seeing a shift in leadership, THANK GOD!, and hopefully our people will see a much needed change. You get that health back in shape and my prayers are with you and Lynn. - LS
...
written by Casey , June 18, 2007 Now, that the elections are over, it is time to move forward and see how Mayor-elect Leppert will fulfill the promises that were made to those in the southern sector. We now have a tool to hold him and the other council members accountable: it is called the Black Agenda and it has been endorsed by Tom and many of the other incoming Black council members. So let's get the party on the road. Lynn, I will call you tomorrow!
...
written by don hill , June 18, 2007 rufus_you and matt from the observer did the very best job of covering the mayors race.your analysis and critical asessment were on target and you helped create a record of commitment to the southern sector by Tom based on issues that bodes well for us.thanks
...
written by frenchfry , June 18, 2007 There a just a few flaws in your logic. First, Oakley didn't carry any of the Black boxes in the general election, yet he carried nearly ALL of them in the runoff. How did that happen? Luck? Okay, skip that one. If Dwaine Carraway helped Leppert so much, how come Oakley carried Dwaine's precinct? Can't answer that either? Try this one... How much influence did Don Hill have in the election? Oakley and Vonciel Hill carried his own precinct -- and District 5. But maybe he'll do better in his bid for County Commissioner next year. I think it's safe to say that the Dallas Black electorate has many capable and influential leaders, which is great for our community. But to act as is John Price is not one of them is ludicrous and petty.
...
written by Lakewood Lawyer , June 18, 2007 I want to second Hill's motion. Hats off to Rufus and really the whole DallasBlog team on their Mayor's race coverage. The Dallas News team often seems confused about what city they are in. Gromer is about as superficial as you can get. Leventhal doesn't seem to get politics at all. Good for Shaw, Barta, Bennett and Merten.
...
written by Will Brown , June 18, 2007 The fact remains that the white North Dallas Republican businessman lost black precincts by very modest margins against a man who has been on the council for years and represents a big swath of southern Dallas. Oakley only got 60% of the vote in his own council district. Yes, JWPrice is a serious factor in southern Dallas politics but others have become serious factors as well. If the white guy who won will incorporate black Dallas into the city's power structure but with new younger faces he will tranform Dallas.
...
written by asmith , June 18, 2007 The Democratic Party in Dallas County will be fine after this. The endorsement was a calculated mistake that would have worked if Don Hill made the run-off, or if Rafael Anchia ran for Mayor and made the runoff. They will once again win most of the countywide offices next year. With a good candidate they have a shot to win Kirk England's Grand Prairie seat.
...
written by asmith , June 18, 2007 At the end of the day Leppert's base in North Dallas held up and was solid for him. Gary Griffith's East Dallas district became part of Leppert's base. High turnout precincts in Rasansky's district performed as usual. Then they made Oakley fight for the south. If you're an Oak Cliff candidate and your in a fight for the south and you're getting nothing in the north or east, you're done. At least that is how I see it north of the trinity.
...
written by Michael Davis , June 18, 2007 This "frenchfry" guy seems a tad bitter. FYI District 4 went 37% Leppert, which was the within the goal of 35-40%. In Dwaine's precinct Leppert scored 46% in an area which is always among the higher turnout areas. So he didn't "win" it but he did darn well. I repeat, that was the goal. There were many people working different areas like Gloria Hogg in piedmont and others. In Dist 4, Leppert won Buckner Terrace, Piedmont, and Southern Hills and got more than 30% in many areas of Oak Cliff. In the Dist 5 areas surrounding Don Hill's neighborhood Leppert scored 43%. These precincts I've mentioned are among the largest between the two districts. Don and others had a hand in that. In other words Leppert did well enough in the precincts that were crucial in Oak Cliff. There were other people involved in the south doing their part as well, but to say Dwaine & Barbara going door-to-door with Leppert and Hill's support didn't help is asinine. All the folks Rufus mentioned had a strong role in that. Bury the hate mr. frenchfry and let's move forward.
...
written by Mary Rogers , June 18, 2007 French Fry makes a good point. Oakley did carry the south and even Dwaine's precinct. Some claim that Dwaine is getting something exchange for an endorsement for Deputy Mayor Pro Tem. I think it should be Vonciel Hill or Carolyn Davis. We need a woman if Salazar gets Mayor Pro Tem. Vonciel has the education and experience.
...
written by Michael Davis , June 19, 2007 Rufus, Great radio segment today. Why is it that people are so jealous that the black power structure is changing and who is now a major part of it vs years past? Why do some people ignore the obvious instead of constantly rambling about rumors and hate?
...
written by frenchfry , June 19, 2007 I think it's you who ignore the obvious. My point is that we have MANY talented and well-equipped leaders, including John Price. Is your hatred of him so blind that you cannot recognize that he is still influential? That's the only point. I do think it speaks well of a North Dallas no-name to pull so many voters in the South. That's not disparaging Leppert or his team. He may end up being the best mayor in Dallas history. Who knows? But, speaking of numbers... if you pull the precincts in District 3, which is the area John Price represents, 25,499 votes were cast. Oakley got 15,652 votes compared to Leppert's 9,845. That's not hate, brother, that's what the number's say. Spread the love. There's enough for everybody.
...
written by John Wiley Price , June 19, 2007 Apparently, Baskin Robbins didn't corner the market in the number 31. Because when it comes to his version of the truth, Rufus has at least thirty-one flavors of it. While Rufus was quick to predict that the sun was going down on me, he neglected to mention the rest of the truth. The bottom line is that County Commissioner District Three cast almost 26,000 of the total 80,000 ballots in the mayorial election. And Ed Oakley received nearly 70% of those votes. It's interesting that when I endorse a candidate it becomes frontpage material for Rufus' brand of yellow journalism. But anyone else, carte blance. Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson penned a letter supporting former judge Charles Rose and he lost. No scoop there. Don Hill was kind enough to lend his hand to Betty Culbreath, although obviously she got licked. Outgoing Councilman Leo Cheney gave his nod to candidate Robert Parish, but he ran into a dip in the road. Mr. Cheney's spot in the horseshoe won't be filled with the flavor he chose. Maybe the Real Deal is that African American voters can only be enticed to go to the polls, and then make up their own minds as to who best represents their interests. Could it be Rufus has been null, void and unemployed for so long that he's lost touch? Any Black man who berates the race in the name of "telling it like it is" always becomes a champion North of the Trinity. Maybe that's why Rufus the "Good Humor Man" is so popular lately. And since we're on the subject of 31, what happened to the $31,000 your wife pocketed before deciding not to run? If you want to build a reputation of telling the truth, you have to tell it all. All 31 flavors of it!!
...
written by Dallas Perfect Voter , June 19, 2007 The seven returning Councilmembers are: Garcia, Rasansky, Salazar, Natinsky, Koop, Medrano, and Hunt. The next Mayor Pro Tem will be Councilwoman Elba Garcia. She has the seniority and given that she has already served as the Deputy Mayor to Mayor Pro Tem Don Hill, it's the right decision...If the Council follows tradition, a great choice for Deputy Mayor Pro Tem would be Caraway. With Oakley gone, Rasansky and Garcia carry the most seniority these days...
...
written by Mary Rogers , June 19, 2007 Caraway should not be Deputy Mayor Pro Tem, see the D Magazine article from May 2001. D Magazine MAY 2001 • Dwaine took an all-expenses-paid beach trip to Mexico, courtesy of Burch Management, the owners of topless bars in Barbara’s district who have been embroiled in constant disputes with the city. • Dwaine borrowed $25,000 from the Southern Dallas Development Corporation, which receives city funds, then defaulted on the note. • Barbara nominated Dwaine for the Olympics 2012 committee; when director Tom Luce declined Dwaine’s appointment, she wrote a letter to Luce, copying the city council, that demanded to know the criteria for selection. • Barbara named Dwaine her appointee to the city ethics task force, which was studying nepotism among other issues. (When that caused a brouhaha, he withdrew.) The city’s new ethics rules include a clause allowing relatives to serve on minor boards, known informally as the “Dwaine Caraway Amendment.” • In 1999, Barbara paid her husband more than $16,000 in campaign money for consulting fees and billboards. • A lawsuit filed last year by the owner of a management company at city-owned Red Bird Airport alleged that the Caraways worked “in tandem” to take over his business and retaliated by having the city cancel its lease when the owner refused to go along. In every case, like another famous political couple, the Caraways denied any impropriety and shrugged off the criticism as politically motivated. When Barbara first appointed Dwaine to the Park Board in 1993, he was not yet her husband. (Dwaine, as Laura Miller ungraciously pointed out in the Observer, had neglected to tell Barbara when he proposed that he was still married; he quickly filed for divorce and they wed in late 1994.) Dwaine proved to be an energetic, if bull-headed, Park Board member, spearheading the $3 million reconstruction of the city’s Cedar Crest Golf Course club house.
...
written by jack jett , June 19, 2007 I remember when I first moved back to Dallas and I heard folks (including my family) bitching about John Wiley Price protesting in front of Parkland Hospital. When I would ask the people, what is he protesting. They did not know. Once I found out the reason he was protesting, I had great respect for him. Now, some years later, Michael Moore has come out with a film that highlights some of the issues Mr. Price was trying to bring to light. The right wing of Texas is fond of spewing venom but when it is spewed back into their face, they are the first the cry, whine, and moan. The good ole white boy network is not a an illusion in Dallas but a harsh reality. If you are in that network, you would never cop to it. You know you are around one when you hear the old line about, "some of my best friends are gay/black/asian/etc". However, if you measure integrity of a man, it takes more machismo to stand up to the "good ole boys" than it does to be part of them. Thank you Mr. Price for your years of hard work. Jack Jett
...
written by sandra crenshaw , June 20, 2007 The civil rights struggle did not mean that we should all walk in lock step behind one black leader or dictator. While John Wiley Price remains one of Dallas most powerful leaders,it doesn't mean he should not be challenged nor does it mean that other influential black leaders who jump in front of cash cows instantly become powerbrokers or that they are given the influence and power of an elected county commissioner, senator, or congressperson. Rufus Shaw and Michael Davis may influence some public opinion here but John Price,in his elected capacity still has power that Davis and Shaw dream of. And all the kings soldiers and all the kings men cannot take that from Price EXCEPT at the ballot box. Michael, that's not jealously or hatred,that's just the greater new real deal. In time, you will learn that you have to respect the position leaders hold. Point in case, there were a handfull of blacks who stood with Laura Miller while all others mentioned here were with Tom Dunning and when she won with North Dallas votes, Did that make those miniscule of black leaders more powerful than John. MIchael, before you start beating your chest, Take John on in the primary and that's when we can really measure your influence and your power. John's fatal flaw will be his desire to destroy all who disagree with him instead of no permanent enemies and no permanent friends like the Carraway approach. John cannot forgive and he cannot forget, so I'm sure it's getting lonely out there for the Commish but meanwhile, he is STILL the commissioner and I'm glad we've decided to start responding on this blog. I enjoyed ALL of the 31 flavors. Frenchfry has it right, this is democracy.
...
written by sandra crenshaw , June 20, 2007 Michael, I need to add one other to your "never seen before in my Life' statements" I can hear the old folks still saying like I'm telling you now, you aint lived long enough, Just keep on living MIchael, thanks for all you are trying to do.
...
written by Michael Davis , June 20, 2007 Thanks for the info. I don't want power at all, I want to empower people so they can have a better city to live in. No one person holds all the chips if the people say they want change and decide to vote. Ugly elections like this continue to discourage new people from getting involved, which keeps the same power structure in place. We've got to start being more progressive and move forward. The same old same isn't cutting it anymore.
...
written by Rufus Shaw , June 20, 2007 To Mr.Price, I don't blame you for worrying about the truth coming out. Now lets not talk about money being misallocated least we start talking about your finances and your dubious hidden relationship with certain law enforcement agencies.I am for letting the truth come out about all of us. I think readers on the Dallasblog will find it all very interesting especailly your story.
...
written by Henry , June 20, 2007 As a professional black male who once lived in north Dallas but has lived in Oak Cliff for several years now, I would like to add my two cents to this discussion. I am APPALLED that many in the black community (as evidenced by some of the misguided comments in this blog) are OK with homophobic thinking and voting in 2007. I never hear about the black ministers of the mega-churches and so-called "leaders" of the black community mentioned in this blog taking a public stand against homophobic thinking and behavior. The movement for equal rights for gays is no different than it was for us as blacks. It is despicable that so many Democrats in south Dallas / Oak Cliff voted for Republican Leppert because Ed Oakley is gay. And you wonder why we as a people often have a hard time being taken seriously. If you misguided folks think that the Republicans from the north who courted you for this election have your best interests at heart, you are sadly mistaken. I hope that those who will undoubtedly disagree with my truth will at least look inside their heart and try to make room for all of us, not just those who are heterosexual. I didn't choose to be gay -- you didn't choose to be straight. And I am OK with who I am -- no need to ask God to cure me, Ed or any other self-respecting gay person.
...
written by Casey , June 20, 2007 The blog is hot now! Let's begin to develop a comprehensive plan for making sure that our communities benefit from all the promises that have been made by the candidates. We need the knowledge of our seasoned elected officials and the energy of those who are getting more engaged now. Let's support the Black Agenda and add to it where it is neccessary to make this a tool of accountability and community progress. We have to have consequences when people violate or lie to us.
...
written by Dallas Perfect Voter , June 20, 2007 As a Dallas voter who reads the Blog to stay informed and be enlightened, it is wonderful to hear direct exchanges between those directly in the know. Please keep that going!!! The recent commentary between Commissioner Price and Mr. Shaw is helpful and insightful. Mr. Davis and Ms. Crenshaw's comments have been terrific, too. There are some points in what has been said that are not clear. Can someone please shed some light for those of us here in the peanut gallery on the following: 1. What are the ethics rules regarding how campaign money can be spent, and who can be paid by a campaign? If someone raises money in a campaign, but does not run or does not win, are they entitled to keep and use any remaining funds for another purpose or not? 2. With all due respect to Commissioner Price (with recognition and credit for his year's of terrific community service), as of 2008, Price will have served in ONE office for 24 consecutive years! While it is great to have such able leadership from South of the Trinity, having one person serve in one position for what amounts to at least a generational tenure cannot be in the community's best interest. Term limits exist to make sure that one person cannot control a position for too long, and also to prevent the crowding out and the lack of fostering of other leadership during that elapsed period of time. Does Commissioner Price intend to seek a 7th term and stand for re-election in 2008? 3. It is not well understood whether the Commissioner's Court is supposed to be a full time job or a part time job?May a County Commissioner hold another paying position or not? A Commissioner's salary and benefits are very lucrative, ~$120,000/yr in cash compensation PLUS a great health care and pension program (which the rest of us mere mortals do not have). The Dallas City Councilmembers, on the other hand, face term limits, can hold an outside position, and get paid $42,000/yr. plus some benefits. They have to stand for re-election every 2 years. Big difference between County and City - in power, influence, and compensation. 4. Can a sitting elected official work on a political campaign, and get paid by another person's campaign for doing so? Seems to me that that would be a huge conflict of interest...and something that ought to be fully disclosed to the public. 5. How many total registered voters in Commissioner District 3? How many of that total fall within the City of Dallas limits? Is 26,000 out of the total eligible voters a good turnout or not for that area? 6. How much of City Council District 3 overlaps or falls within with County Commissioner Court District 3? Didn't Oakley already have a natural base from his own District? Given that Neumann prevailed over Hernandez, how does one best understand those numbers? 7. How exactly was Max Wells supposed to be the best candidate for the Southern Sector, especially when they had Mayor Pro Tem Hill and Oakley to choose from at that point? [Fact: Wells came in dead last in the field of credible Mayoral candidates]. Why did Commissioner Price work for and endorse Wells in the original Mayoral election? Thanks in advance for information.
...
written by sandra crenshaw , June 20, 2007 Perfect voter, voter education is the true key to full liberation and democracy. If only we had more voters like you, money would not be the ruling factor in campaigns. Point in case, most voters in District 8 were influenced by who had the most yard signs. Atkins had zero name Id and with 100,000 dollars, he was able to buy thousands of dollars worth of yard signs, mailers, radio advertisement,and paid phone bankers. Voters also relied on the endorsements of Al Lipscomb and Fantroy They elected Fantroy with four previous felony indictments on his record for lying and cheating on various fronts, just because Lipscomb endorsed him. Therefore those who voted against Fantroy using these indictments as indicators of the candidates's trustworthyness were not surprised when Fantroy misused the rent money from Paul Quinn College's community development corporation for his own personal use. (PQ sued Fantroy, et al to get the money back as opposed to prosecution) Likewise, Tennel Atkins councilman-elect was endorsed by FAntroy, Lipscomb,Allen MGill, Darren Reagan, and Gail Terrell. The common denominator between these powerbrokers, is that all are under FBI investigation for their involvement in the handling of the money in the public's trust. Guilty or not of the charges against them,the fact remains that Paul Quinn does not have their 7-11 Franchise, Hilvale Drug Center is closed and god knows we need drug treatment centers, and the Albertson-West Cliff mall shopping center is not black owned and controlled. When black people mess up, we rarely get second chances. When the Enron folks get out of the pen, they will become consultants. Davis continues to decry the negative campaigning. I believe the public has a right to know how Leppert or any other person running for office does business as an indicator of how they will handle our money. What is negative about that ? If the ads or not true, then a candidate can refute them or point out the inaccuracies, but all Davis does is say they are negative. If the ads were false, the public should know that.too This "woo is me" response, is a campaign ploy used as reverse pychology and too often we as voters fall for it. I think the Leppert (supporters)were negative in their focus on sexual orientation while no one can tell us how Leppert plans to finance our fight against crime. ( I supported Wells because he proposed a popular crime tax district as a solution ) I guesss no one was paying to tell the Democratic voters in NOvember that the head of the county government is gay, or that the sheriff is gay, or was it because they needed gay voters to take Craig Watkins over the top. See how money influnces campaigns. Voters will have to come more savy and investigate the candidates for themselves and DON'T BELIEVE THE HYPE. (thanks Cheryl Smith for the phrase.) Read the financial reports and see how the candidates spent their money and who it came from. Beware that elected officials dance with who brought them. Contributions and who they came from is good indicator how an elected official will vote. Hope I have helped.
...
written by Shay Cathey , June 20, 2007 Dallas Perfect Voter, Please accept this disclaimer that I am answering questions to the best of my ability based on my previous political experience and working knowledge. Good questions. 1. The Texas Ethics Commission set rules about campaign finance. I've spent my fair share of time working with TEC in previous positions. There are clear rules about how much you can raise, how you can spend it, and how it has to be reported. If a violation is suspected, contact the TEC. However, I do not know what happens to money that is raised and not spent. City officials report to the City Secretary. County officials report to the County Clerk. State officials report directly to TEC. 2. There are no term limits for county officials or state legislators. (I'm not sure about statewide officeholders, i.e. Governor, Lt. Governor, etc.) 3. Commissioners and the County Judge are technically full-time elected officials because of their workload and compensation. For many years, the City Council was viewed as part-time and paid as such. It was not until 2001 that the city charter was changed to provide them with a full-time salary. However, it is far less than what other county elected officials make. State legislators are also considered part-time (which is laughable) and they are not paid a full-time salary. Most of them have other jobs or other sources of income. 4. I suppose elected officials could receive compensation (either directly or through a campaign contribution) as a byproduct of their endorsement. I have never known an elected official to receive money for doing so. Most lend their names and their resources to candidates of their choice as a means of asserting their influence. All campaigns must report their expenditures and contributions so it would be easy to track who's getting and who's giving. 5. Don't know the exact details of District 3 but it does include some suburbs. The turnout in Saturday's election was pathetic across the city, so in short, 26,000 voters is probably not good. Visit the Dallas County elections department website (archived election results) for details. 6. It's hard to read the maps precisely, but my best guess is that more than half of Council District 3 is in Commissioner Mayfield's District 4 (the part west of Kiest & Ledbetter) but yes, some of it is in Commissioner Price's District 3. 7. That's a question for JWP, Al Lipscomb, Don Hicks, and Diane Ragsdale who all supported Wells in the general election. I have heard that Hill's late entry into race may have cost him their support because they had already committed. Royce West supported Hill, though.
...
written by Sharon Boyd , June 20, 2007 1. A city council candidate may donate portions of of contributed funds to other candidates and/or return the money to the donors. 2. At one time, Commissioner P was supposed to be Congresswoman Johnson's annointed heir -- but that's been said for several others. He has stayed way too long. All the more reason to keep term limits at City Hall. 3. County Commissioners may have 2nd businesses. Commissioner Mayfield continued to practice law after he was elected, don't know if he still does. 4. If you getting paid to run a campaign in another commissioner's court, there might be a problem -- but I doubt there's a leal prohibition. For many PR types, it's just a job. 5. Dist 3 includes most if not all of Oak Lawn, as well as South Dallas. 6. Look up the district maps on DallasCityHall.com and the county's website to compare boundary lines. 7. I supported Darrell Jordan in the general election. If your candidate doesn't make the runoff and you care about the outcome, you should pick one of the two finalists and commit whatever you can to getting that person elected. I'm no JWP fan. He's a bully. Look at what he did to Laura Miller and her family. Still, he's effective and a savy politician. He votes very Republican on the Commissioner's Court. This election was not so much about Ed being gay as it was about Ed's record at City Hall. Ed got elected by Blacks as a gay man when he ran against Dwaine Caraway. Ed just got too caught up in the dark side of City Hall and ran a very mean-spirited campaign. He's got a smile that can melt ice. Should have used it more. People wanted change at City Hall. In a few years people may want a change in District 3 at the Commissioners Ct. We will have to wait and see.
...
written by Henry , June 21, 2007 I guess I have a hard time understanding how anyone can say that Ed's sexuality had no impact on how the election turned out. My guess is that there are a lot of ostriches in the city of Dallas. I think that it is time for said ostriches to take their heads out of the sand. The morning news, despite what it says, is biased against gays -- how often has it written positive stories on gay life? Some morning news bloggers wrote that they did not vote for Ed because of his sexuality; Bloggers here have said that blacks did not vote for Ed because of his sexuality; so to say that Ed's sexuality had nothing to do with his losing is hard to fathom.
...
written by Mary Hasan , June 21, 2007 The politics in this city have become so nasty and dirty, it's going to get where good people will not want to run. You can run for office and basically base your whole campaign on your opponent. I use to think that when I retired, I would run for office. Not anymore. I decided that my time would be better spent working with children. Look at all the money spent on campaigns in this election. Just think if it had been used to revitalize a neighborhood. Good people who really care about this city cannot afford to run and then we wonder why the rich get what they want. The majority of us in the southern sector never support our candidates with money, myself included. When you have a daughter in college, a grandson, a housepayment and rent, money is limited but I will volunteer. We wonder why these people get special treatment, just remember, they are the ones who paid to get these people elected. I usually try to figure out who can do the less harm. Look at all the trash that was generated from this election and then we complain about government. What do we expect? I voted for Ed for councilman. I voted for Leppert for mayor. Not because Ed was gay but because he gave us his word that he was going to support our SIP and not 5 minutes later, he was the deciding vote to kill it. I will never vote for him again because I don't trust him. Politicians lie all the time and we keep electing them and then we gripe about how things are being runned. I am what they call old school and I believe your word is suppose to mean something. Leppert made us no promises but he answered all our questions. He was in the hot seat with no moderator, no advance questions but after 2 hours, there was only one person in the room who was still undecided. When people see something in print, over and over again, they begin to think it is true without really thinking about it. Leppert was made to look like a rich republican who was trying to kill black children and some people did not vote for him because of this. They didn't stop to think that he was the CEO and if you are going to judge him, then it must be on what he did when he found out. Do you actually believe that this man was at the site? I have high hopes that he will be good for Dallas. And by the way Leo Chaney supported Carolyn Davis.
...
written by R H Gilliland , June 21, 2007 (Filed under 'Duh') I repeat the obvious: Leppert "got more black votes than anyone...." because, after the Dallas News headlined front page, I...who live in Southeast Dallas and have many black neighbors....watched the Leppert Signs spring up like mushrooms after the rain. The church based black community in my area were doing more than Carol Reed and Rob Allyn (or the Heritage Alliance) to see the unknown North Dallas 'coalition builder' defeated 'him'. I have no problem with Leppert. But I do believe it is laughable to think that the absolutely wildly 'gay is a white man's sin' black church crowd were not all over this after the Dallas News...rightly or wrongly... ran that front page 'story'. I live in the Southern Sector, folks. My neighbors are all three colors. 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 on this street. I am also arguably ‘in the media’. I know what I heard and what I saw...before and after. And let us not omit the wonder of Don Hill's death bed conversion. I actually watched a woman who ran unsuccessfully for city council yank her Oakley sign up and a Leppert appeared after Hill's 'see no evil, hear no evil' epiphany.
...
written by sandra crenshaw , June 22, 2007 Sharon, where do you get your scoop on black politicos? People like Michael Davis and Johnathan take your word as gospel. Why don't you defer to those who were involved in the black community. John is not, never was, and never will be EBJ's annointed heir to her seat. They have been arch rivals since the late 70's.before the Mark White days. There jusr cannot be two queen bees or heads of state with some people. At one time during the congressional redistricting battle ( The question was should Dallas blacks be divided into two congressional districts that were at that time held by Martin Frost and John Bryant or be "packed" into a majority black district thus creating another republican district." ) John vigourously supported the black district which put him at odds with the demo party who wanted to keep two demo seats in congress. Some viewed John's position as siding with the republicans. at one time, he was accused of boarding a plane paid by the republicans to lobby in Austin. At that time everyone thought John would be the heir apparent to the newly carved seat, but he was facing legal problems and did not have old guard demo party money because of his position in redistricting and his combative style. John's position played well with the constiuients and I would have loved to see if the voters would have supported John's style vs. EBJ. John's enemies all ganged up against him, including the ministers and the unions. If John were in Congress, He'd be a little fish in a big pond with plenty to do. I think that John is bored in this little pond and has to do too many silly things to make the news. Five bucks for anybody who can name all five commissioners. He's far too advanced for the mindset in Dallas. Yes, I;m on John's hate list, I'm not a blind loyalist but I love his black consiousness and energy. He would have made a great national poliltical commentator. Who knows maybe John will give you your wish Sharon and run for Congress but it won't be with EBJ's blessing unless you know something I don't. I did say John does not forget and does not forgive. Neither does Eddie. Mary, I never believed one time that Leo was not supporting Parrish. (Follow Willie Mae Coleman.) Leo wants a political furture possible a state rep. He knew he'd always have his pastor support but he couldn't risk alienating Carolyn and having her as an opponent or working her butt off against him. It's called neutralinzing baby. Voters were too scared that Leo would run the district through Parrish. Carol's win over Parrish will be poor Leo's legacy because District 7 supported Carol as an anti Leo vote. and no statue can refute that slaughter. Perfect voter, Please do not rely on politicos for the answers to your questions, especially the finance laws, TEC will mail you the rules, know them because there are penalaties both civil and criminal for violating them. Tom Delay was indicted for trying to get around the rules. So answers, like I suppose and may be probably got Tom in deep do do. All election matters should be asked of the local, state, and federal authorities. They all have toll free numbers and lawyers on staff to answer your questions and even then you better get it in writing.
...
written by Linus Spiller , June 23, 2007 Ditto Boyd and Hasan on Ed Oakley...and Henry, sometimes its not all about gay... Ed Oakley's record at City Hall, including what I consider a conflict of interest to have real estate holdings along the Trinity while Chairing the council committee of the same name, coupled with his BROKEN PROMISES to his 1ST Council District, District 6, of which I have been a resident for over 10 years, were the deciding factors in my decision to support Leppert. Sharon Boyd is correct that Ed was elected as a gay man against Dwaine, but what Boyd left out was the substantial campaign support Ed received in the NW Dallas/Bachman area. That, together with the southern support, tipped the scales in his favor in that election. My mother always said "beware of a person that smiles all the time." This would apply to Oakley. While on council, he would smile constantly while making decisions that weren't in the best interest of Dallas. If he got called on this publicly (the recent property grab issue in the Observer is a prime example of this), he would back-pedal in a hurry, still smiling. ...And to Henry, I can understand your frustration as all of us at some level need the affirmation of who we are as human beings, but electing some one solely on one aspect of who they are really should have no place in politics (i.e., 1st woman, 1st black, 1st hispanic, 1st gay, etc). Individuals should be elected to public office based on their experience and ability to be a prudent public servant, not a politician. My household has 3 gay members in it, including myself; we did not support Ed because of his city hall record. Likewise, we did support Leppert because of his track record in awarding minority based construction contracts in other major US cities, including Atlanta. As someone who lived in the southern sector for 8 years, it bothers me to drive to the south (I am still involved in numerous activities in that region) and can't find an Office Depot, can't find a Starbucks. My former residence is behind Kimball High School and we used to have a Krogers over there. It is gone. There is one grocery store in the area, but where I live now in the north, I can go to Albertsons (2 stores), Tom Thumb, Minyards, Fiesta, Carnival, and Danal's, all within a 5 mile radius. The southern sector deserves sufficient retail development and I believe Leppert will be the one to spark this development. I'm not naive enough to think that overnight the southern sector will be this thriving metropolis because Leppert is in office. It won't, but Leppert will plant the seeds necessary that his predecessor will nurture and grow. Now I do believe though that we will see "some" flowers under his administration.
...
written by jack jett , June 25, 2007 Rufus...my man.. You failed to answer the question posed to you from Mr. Price. If you are unable to answer a question do you just tell people to go away and not come back? In others words, are you above being questioned? Are you Dick Cheney? just sayin........dats all jack jett Write comment
|
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|




















