No account yet?
Subscription Options
Subscribe via RSS, or
 
Free Email Alert

Sign up to receive a daily e-mail alert with links to Dallas Blog posts.

New Site Search
Login


Aea at TechTitans Legands
The Texas Legend is an award bestowed on an individual, company or organization in Texas whose vision, leadership and influence have had an enduring effect on the technology industry.
W. Dal Berry W. Dal Berry
Matthew Blanton Matthew Blanton
Pike Powers Pike Powers
James Truchard James Truchard
Bill DeOre
Click for Larger Image
   
Dallas Sports Blog
Local Team Sports News
NBA.com: Mavericks News
Texas Rangers News
DallasCowboys.com
FC Dallas News
Stars Recent Headlines:
Good News Dallas
Lifestyles
Reagan Who? PDF Print E-mail
by Tara Ross    Mon, May 21, 2007, 06:08 PM
The party of Ronald Reagan is hurting. Republican officials seem to have forgotten Reagan’s cheerful resolve, his belief in individualism, and his small government philosophy.

 To the contrary, the actions of today’s Republicans demonstrate that they find Reaganesque principles to be expendable. Oh, Republican politicians cite Reagan approvingly, of course, knowing how fondly he is remembered by Republican voters. But their verbal tributes are all too often followed by actions that would surely make Reagan roll over in his grave.

How can these Republicans be so unlike Reagan, yet somehow be astonished and confused when they are turned out of office or receive low approval ratings from voters? Their obtuseness is startling.

Today’s Republican leaders find themselves in this position, at least in part, because they have used the War in Iraq as a crutch. It has become easy to blame the war for virtually any discontent expressed by voters. No war is without its problems and low points, and the problems of war may seem almost unavoidable. Those Republicans who blame the war need not look to see how they may have personally failed (particularly those Republicans who were not intimately involved in the decision to go to war). Painful soul-searching and mea culpas can be avoided. Real problems—and thus real solutions—remain undiscovered.

Unfortunately, Republican leaders are avoiding the very actions needed if the party is to return to the days of Reagan. The party has strayed far from its roots. A painful soul-searching is exactly what is required.

This author has often noted the spendthrift, big government ways of congressional Republicans. But the problem extends beyond the national level, infecting state legislators as well. Indeed, many supposedly conservative Republicans in Texas have turned into big government sympathizers, a fact that may surprise their constituents. Last year, Republican legislators pushed through a tax increase. This year, flush with extra government funds, they are creating all sorts of new public initiatives. Legislators seem oblivious to the fact that government does not need to propose and enforce a “fix” for every issue. They have forgotten Reagan’s preference for private solutions that rely on individuals, rather than expensive, inefficient government bureaucracies. Government should be as small as possible, allowing voters to spend their own money and run their own lives.

Much of this legislation is passed behind the scenes, out of the media spotlight. Even a small sample of these bills may surprise readers who think their representatives are small government Reaganites.

On April 26, the Republican-led Senate passed SB 556, a big government initiative that promises to help prevent obesity in the State of Texas. No Texan should be expected to go on a diet on his own. It’s simply too hard to lose weight without the government holding your hand every step of the way. Never fear. The new Interagency Obesity Council will help, if the Senate gets its way. And the Legislative Budget Board assures us that this initiative won’t cost taxpayers a dime—well, at least not this year. The government-sponsored solutions proposed by the Council are sure to cost a pretty penny someday.

But preventing obesity is small potatoes, compared to preventing disease. On April 27, Senators approved SB 308, a bill that would protect injection drug users from some ramifications of their bad habit. Under the bill, drug users may anonymously trade in their dirty needles and syringes for clean ones. What a convenient way to avoid infection. So much easier than stopping a drug habit. And non-drug users don’t need to worry. The Legislative Budget Board claims that this initiative will not have a substantial fiscal impact on the State of Texas. Better yet, the Senate Research Center assures us that the bill will not facilitate drug use.

Sure. And they have a bridge to sell you, too.

Not to be outdone, House Republicans have decided to cure cancer. HB 14 will create the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas. Well-intentioned, naturally, but what makes Republican legislators believe that creating a massive government bureaucracy is the most efficient and effective contribution that Texans can make to curing cancer? How much better to focus on direct, private donations to hospitals and research centers. Oh, and the fiscal impact of this enormous government enterprise during the next five years? Only $132,052,783. A bargain, really. Voters should quit complaining about their high tax rates.

Of course, this doesn’t even begin to touch many, bigger issues pending before the legislature. Republicans have failed to act swiftly on many taxpayer protection bills, and they have also (so far) failed to repeal the Telecommunications Infrastructure Fee. Needless to say, they apparently have no interest in reversing last year’s tax increase. But each of these items should be a no-brainer for legislators who allegedly believe in Republican small government principles.

A few Republican legislators still believe in the small government principles of the Republican platform. These elected officials should be applauded. They often find themselves standing firm on principle, even in the face of opposition from their own colleagues. Many other Republicans, however, have lost their way. If they will not engage in the soul-searching that is needed to help the Republican Party reverse course, then these legislators should be replaced with men and women who still remember the small government principles espoused by Reagan.

Comments (15)add comment
...
written by Farinata X , May 22, 2007

Oh, here we go again. Conservatism never fails. It's just that its practioners are so bad at it. Doesn't it ever cross your mind that it's the sorry conservative ideology that's the problem here?


...
written by jan b , May 22, 2007

Conservatism is a failure as opposed to...oh, say...communism (Think Stalin, or Mao) or socialism (think Cuba..Oh, I know their health care is wonderful, at least the health care that the Western world is allowed to see. That's why pregnant mothers routinely jump into shark-infested waters to get away from paradise.

To me, the dynamic is that I don't want your money and you do want mine and therein lies the problem. Liberal theology/politics rests in taking the money of some and giving it to special interests dictated by opinions.............. dictated by vote-getting.

Since we are not going to agree, I think the compromise would rest in small government that doesn't force people to give up their wallet to bolster the opinion/vote-getting of others.

So, at the end of the day, you are entitled to your opinions, but you are not entitled to my paycheck. Simple, really.....



...
written by Francine Borden , May 22, 2007

A more correct statement would be "Ronald Reagan started the Republican Party down the path that resulted in George W. Bush and the destruction of the Republican Party.

For the life of me, I don't understand why Republicans don't seem to be smart enough to realize that.



...
written by Wes Riddle , May 22, 2007

Tara, I think your piece is right on target. Clearly conservative principles have to be reformulated and applied to new times and challenges, but the Republican party has selectively stopped consulting its own great principles (those codified with Reagan). One could argue federalism never did get a fair shake--it should have followed Reagan and the Cold War, but it didn't. We are still waiting for constitutional government, but now even the concepts of smaller more responsive government; of economical government; of open and accountable(vice secretive) government are not identified with Republican officials or the GOP the way they should. Thanx for being thoughtful in your piece.

Wes Riddle



...
written by Don Van Slyke , May 22, 2007

It is the water in Washington, DC, and in Austin, Texas.

Drinking from the seemingly endless pool of taxpayer money quickly causes drunkenness resulting in loss of judgment and spending binges without end.



...
written by bk , May 22, 2007

Easy, Francine. Because you're wrong.
You and Ms. X never address the arguments, only your usual ad hominem conclusions.



...
written by Farinata X , May 22, 2007

Shorter Jan B:

Since we're not going to agree, let's compromise and do what I want.



...
written by Francine Borden , May 22, 2007

Farinata:

Ronald Reagan shamelessly pandered to racists and segregationists by making his first speech after the Republican Convention in 1980 in Philadelphia, MS.

Philadelphis, MS was the scene of an incident in which the sheriff's department conspired with the KKK to murder three civil rights workers. Reagan's speech was in support of "states' rights" which were code words for segregation.

So, I find it quite humorous that every Republican candidate for president is a white male, and all of them are fighting over who is the heir to Ronald Reagan.

Of course, worshipping Reagan gives a pretty good clue as to why so many Republicans still support incompetent George W. Bush.

And, as far as Reagan and spending -- How much was that deficit again? You know, the one Reagan left for Bill Clinton to clean up?



...
written by Matt Pate , May 22, 2007

Correctly read Jan B:

Since we're not going to agree, let's compromise whereby I'll spend my money as I please and you spend your money as you please.

And I think Faranita is on Francine's side, unless addressing her was merely a side bar.



...
written by Francine Borden , May 22, 2007

Does this mean that those who have no children shouldn't have to pay school tax?

Does it mean that if you don't drive or have a car, you shouldn't have to pay for roads?

Just how far do you plan to go with this my money and your money deal? I'm happy to keep my money and let you keep yours as long as we are clear that I don't have to pay for anything that doesn't directly benefit me.



...
written by jan b , May 23, 2007

Matt;
I don't have the foggiest notion what point you were making.

Francine;
Reductio absurdum is not my forte, nor my taste.



...
written by Francine Borden , May 23, 2007

Jan B says, "Reductio absurdum is not my forte, nor my taste."

Translation:

"I'll use some big words and distract them from the validity of their argument."

First, it is called, "reductio ad absurdum".

Secondly, your comment is like saying, "I can't cook okra and anyway, I don't like it."

It has nothing to do with the argument or its validity.



...
written by jan b , May 23, 2007


First, it is called, "reductio ad absurdum". -Francine

You are absolutely correct that "ad" should have been inserted and I must ask to be forgiven for the typo.

I would only note that there are many who assert that periods are happiest when bracketed inside of quotation marks. Perhaps they are wrong.

As for; "Secondly, your comment is like saying, 'I can't cook okra and anyway, I don't like it.'" -francine

No, it's not....

As far as the validity of the argument -- please allow me to search for the substantive nature of a post that merely pouts (in response to the noton of conservatism) wheher those who don't own cars should have to pay taxes for roads. I am trying to think of any human being that I know who doesn't use/need roads. Alas, the quandary escapes me.

Perhaps if I could latch onto something more than this, I would.

--reductio ad absurdum



...
written by Francine Borden , May 23, 2007

Jan:

Your eyes will be opened when the Democrats control the U. S. House, U. S. Senate, and the White House in January 2009 - unless we can manage impeaching Bush and Cheney before then.

So, Jan, simply sit back and watch all will become clear.



...
written by Ian Perry , May 25, 2007

Good article. Given the failure of the Republican party to limit the size of government we need a shakeup inside the party.

Limited government conservatives have a candidate, let's support him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF37-9OGblw




Write comment
smaller | bigger
password
 

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

© 2008 Dallasblog.com, the Dallas, Texas news blog and Dallas, Texas information source for the DFW Metroplex. - DALLAS BLOG
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.