| There is No Machine |
|
|
|
| by Rufus Shaw | Sun, May 13, 2007, 12:45 PM |
|
The fact that the Dallas Mayoral race has come down to a run-off between southern sector, Councilman Ed Oakley, and North Dallas businessman, Tom Leppert, comes as no surprise to me.
I predicted in an earlier column that Leppert would get into the run-off. I, and many others, had penciled in Ed Oakley as one of his possible opponents. Still, this election was full of surprises and lessons about the Dallas electorate. For example, I predicted that southern sector Black voters would turn-out in huge numbers and I was dead wrong about that. I was not surprised to see Tom Leppert out duel Max Wells for Black voters. I had predicted that Leppert’s first class Black consulting team and his outreach to the Black faith-based community would get him Black votes and it did. This provides us with one of many major lessons about the Dallas electorate. There is no John Price dominated political machine able to turn-out the Black vote for any candidate he chooses in the southern sector. The John Price group, which primarily consists of Mr. Price, Demetris Sampson, and political consultant Kathy Neeley, were rumored to have sway over a $300,000 budget to get out the Black vote for Max Wells. Ms. Neeley’s published fee of over $12,000 a month was probably the largest consulting fee ever paid to a Black consultant to get out the Black vote in Dallas history. But they did not deliver. As of this writing, all of the numbers are not in yet, but it is clear that Max Wells, who was depending on a strong southern sector showing, did not do near as well as he expected with Black voters. I have long said that Mr. Wells would have problems attracting the Black vote because of his weak history in dealing with the Black community. His endorsement from several former Black City council members as well as Mr. Price’s endorsement did little to help Wells in the Black community. While many in the media all but guaranteed Mayor Pro Tem Don Hill a place in the run-off, I remained skeptical. I am a great fan of Councilman Hill but I never felt his campaign generated the kind of excitement with Black voters that he needed to propel him into the run-offs. I have no doubt that the lingering FBI investigation cost Don Hill a serious shot at becoming Dallas’ next mayor if for no other reason then the investigation caused Hill to start his campaign too late. Don was also hurt by the poor turn-out from Black voters in the southern sector. The battle between Oakley and Leppert will once again put the Black electorate on center stage. Oakley is expected to get the endorsement of Don Hill and quite possibly the John Price Group may join the Ed Oakley camp. There is talk that Oakley will attempt to make the run-off election a battle between a southern sector Democrat and a North Dallas Republican. That strategy could be problematic for the Oakley camp. Most political observers are aware that neither the Democratic nor the Republican Party has any involvement in Dallas ’ non-partisan city elections. I consider the tactic of evoking partisan politics as fear mongering, designed to frighten Black voters into voting against Tom Leppert. One only has to remember that Mayor Laura Miller is a prominent Democrat who did not enjoy any goodwill with the Black electorate. Former Mayor Ron Kirk, also a prominent Democrat, enjoyed wide support from local Republican voters. In other words, political party affiliation has proven to have no influence on Dallas mayors. If Mr. Oakley aligns himself with the controversial John Price Group, he will lose support from many Black voters who are opposed to Mr. Price. The Oakley campaign will also have a hard time selling the Democrat versus Republican scenario to Black voters since Mr. Price has just recently supported Max Wells who is also a Republican. I expect a rough and possibly nasty campaign with a great deal of fear mongering about gays taking over city hall if Ed Oakley is elected or Republicans taking over city hall if Tom Leppert is elected. Both candidates have too much going for them for either of their campaigns to descend into fear mongering. And, no, I don’t know just how large the Black vote will be for this all important run-off election. But I do know there is no Black political machine run by Commissioner John Wiley Price that can guarantee the Black vote. At least that is how I see it from South Of the Trinity.
Bookmark
Email This
Comments (11)
![]()
...
written by Roger Herrera , May 13, 2007 Mr. Rufus, the fact that blacks did not turn out in huge numbers for Don Hill (a very qualified man) and Hispanics did not turn out for me, seems to nail the coffin shut on affirmative action and 14-1. Anytime anyone wants race consideration, they need to be told "remember 5/12/2007".
...
written by Velma Johnson , May 14, 2007 If Dallas is moving beyond race that is good for everyone who lives here. Oakley's problem is motivating his base and drawing Hills votes because he won't draw many from Wells, Griffith, Coats and Jordan. Can Oakley do that without attacking Leppert as a racist, homophobic, rich North Dallas Republican businessman? I doubt it very much. But if he goes that route he will drive up turnout in the north. Mr. Oakley is in a real fix.
...
written by Preston A. , May 14, 2007 Price proves he can only turnout so many votes. Given that he didn't support Hill he will have zip influence with Hill voters. In fact none of the black politicos will have any influence with Hill voters. Only Hill will have - maybe. Here is betting the don't vote at all and Oakley get wiped out.
...
written by John McClelland , May 14, 2007 Rufus and Roger, Maybe you all have look passed the fact that NOBODY turned out. 11% voter turnout is pathetic, regardless of race. It is apathy by everyone that has Dallas in the place it is now. I mean, what does it say when I got more votes in my race in Place 12 than Steve Salazar did as an unopposed incumbent in Place 6? West Dallas should be ashamed.
...
written by Roger Herrera , May 14, 2007 John, you're exactly right. The stats you cite show that 14-1 is not fair. Dist 13 has the most active voters and should have several Council votes, not just one.
...
written by Michael Davis , May 14, 2007 Rufus, Oakley has already started playing the partisan politics angle. Did you see the mailer that he sent the week of the election?
...
written by Judd D. Bradbury , May 14, 2007 Rufus I too hope that the better angels of our nature find some fertile soil. There should be plenty of room for each candidate to find positive appeal. Leppert could ask for a little de-programming and find more appeal. Viewing Oakley as an underdog anywhere in the city would be a mistake as well. The precinct analysis demonstrates a very street smart campaigner.
...
written by Rufus Shaw , May 14, 2007 Michael, I did see the mailer Mr. Oakley sent out urging Black voters to vote for a Democrat. I think bring partisan politics into this race is a mistake. By doing so Mr. Oakley will risk alienating the many prominent Democrats who are supporting Tom Leppert.
...
written by Mary Hasan , May 22, 2007 I voted for Hill and he will have no influence with my vote, my family or my friends. Iwill evaluate what Leppert and decide whether or not I will support him. I know that I will not support Oakley. His word means absolutely nothing and he wants to be mayor so bad. This has always been his dream and he will lie to get your vote. It will be a sad day for Dallas if Oakley gets elected. Michael is right Rufus. Oakley has already made the race partisan. He feels that because the Democrats won in the county, most will support him. He is sadly mistaken, the African American community will not win this race for him, so he better try to get support from North Dallas. You have four sets of voting blacks - the ones that will vote for Oakley, the ones who will vote for Leppert, the ones who will not vote for a mayoral candidate but will vote in the run-off for their council candidate and the ones that finds this race boring and will not vote at all. I am leaning toward Leppert and after a meeting with him, my decision will be made. Right now, the only decision that I am certain of is that Oakley's word means nothing and I will not vote for him. I know it will be a sad day for Dallas if Ed wins. Write comment
|
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|





















